openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mark Struberg (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Comment Edited] (OPENJPA-2171) asm should be optional
Date Fri, 11 Oct 2013 08:12:41 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13792443#comment-13792443
] 

Mark Struberg edited comment on OPENJPA-2171 at 10/11/13 8:10 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------------

great, txs! I 
I think it helps to know that xbean-asm4-shaded is nothing else than the standard ASM jar
but with it's packages shaded to a unique package name per major version (as those contain
binary backward incompatibilities). It does not have any runtime dependency. Not to a geronimo
project nor to anything else.


was (Author: struberg):
great, txs! I 

> asm should be optional
> ----------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENJPA-2171
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2171
>             Project: OpenJPA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Romain Manni-Bucau
>            Assignee: Mark Struberg
>              Labels: 2.3.0-candidate
>             Fix For: 2.3.0
>
>         Attachments: ASM.patch, kernel.patch
>
>
> openjpa uses since some versions asm but in tomee for instance we use a shade (through
the xbean one org.apache.xbean:xbean-asm-shaded to avoid classloading/version issues with
webapps/applications.
> it can be nice if openjpa can provide us an issue to this because we really don't want
to provide asm in our binaries.
> solutions can be to use the xbean shade, give us an interface to implement or to try
several implementation (xbean shade, asm,...) by reflection



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Mime
View raw message