Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EE92110195 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:19:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31667 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jul 2013 13:19:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 31511 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jul 2013 13:19:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 31502 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jul 2013 13:19:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:19:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kwsutter@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.176] (HELO mail-lb0-f176.google.com) (209.85.217.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:19:19 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f176.google.com with SMTP id w10so2911048lbi.7 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 06:18:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=RpJWrJUqdUs4G5kaPzwLB+z5hd0XxmgRJKqzmvovpaI=; b=T1c9RVHiPg3mzEJG/pMDLYqlAtjdnt0sjNTBoFt5OSRTBxmNGK/BPiTDWCGu5/w/r1 n0UTWIuxrP6DqF6l+taU5AKJHhj6rXx+a3GJ3YjxIkPYv05u4Q/qeW4jiLb6YXgiUc/3 ZDmYXTmFC+r2k0xb89otynXCh02nD1GfReXno7RrpumivL/ZZfYARKOpvcLMB5eM9rsH UE7mvO3576xPZfmWp1aLwHmoaxVoiWuqcR45i+uNU0kn6tGAYjzGOIgIep7dq3lmydwi gagPdcHGvn55t65UEaQi45e1YIyS4M1wrbIIyieoFvIhzHXJZeU7AtwAMJf91BX0s/BV NiWA== X-Received: by 10.152.3.7 with SMTP id 7mr29100998lay.66.1375190338889; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 06:18:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.168.194 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 06:18:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1369238647629-7583996.post@n2.nabble.com> <1374931856.84500.YahooMailNeo@web28903.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> From: Kevin Sutter Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:18:38 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: release 2.3.x To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e014940aaa5ec0b04e2ba7323 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e014940aaa5ec0b04e2ba7323 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Romain, You have had a TCK issue with OpenJPA for 3 days? With trunk? But, it was clean 4 days ago? Hmmm... We haven't noticed any TCK failures... Can you provide some more details? Thanks. Kevin On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > We have an issue for 3 days but the snapshot of 4 days ago passed > Le 27 juil. 2013 15:31, "Mark Struberg" a =E9crit : > > > I can roll a release, but I have not run the TCK. But I assume it gets > run > > during the daily tomee CI run anyway. > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Kevin Sutter > > To: dev@openjpa.apache.org > > Cc: > > Sent: Friday, 26 July 2013, 18:13 > > Subject: Re: release 2.3.x > > > > Hi Romain, > > Yeah, once we figured out the source of the one change you were > interested > > in, I guess this fell off the radar. I'd be in favor of a 2.3.0 releas= e, > > but I personally don't have the cycles right at the moment. Any other > > takers from our development community? > > > > Thanks, > > Kevin > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > > wrote: > > > > > up? > > > > > > is the 2.3.0 ready to be release? we would like to get it in tomee an= d > we > > > are still waiting for fixes/updates to get released :(. > > > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau * > > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/5/22 Romain Manni-Bucau > > > > > > > no since it was fixed on trunk > > > > > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau * > > > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/5/22 Pinaki Poddar > > > > > > > >> > the criteria api bug where only a single groupby or having was > used > > > (", > > > >> " > > > >> was missing when the jpql was created) > > > >> > > > >> did you file a JIRA? > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> ----- > > > >> Pinaki Poddar > > > >> Chair, Apache OpenJPA Project > > > >> -- > > > >> View this message in context: > > > >> > > > > http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/release-2-3-x-tp7583967p7583996.html > > > >> Sent from the OpenJPA Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.co= m. > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --089e014940aaa5ec0b04e2ba7323--