openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: L2 cache && em.find()?
Date Fri, 12 Jul 2013 19:50:08 GMT
Ill have a look on monday, i tested with a trivial case and it worked,
maybe linked to the idclass of the entity in the relationship.
Le 12 juil. 2013 21:22, "Rick Curtis" <curtisr7@gmail.com> a écrit :

> Romain -
>
> This still sounds very similar to OPENJPA-2285... could you perhaps put
> together a small UT?
>
> Thanks,
> Rick
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Rick Curtis <curtisr7@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I actually reverted the changes from 2.3.0 and 2.2.2 (I'll change the fix
> > versions field) because the change wasn't kosher with regards to the
> spec.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > rmannibucau@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Not the same case since i'm in eager mode for the relationship and it
> >> still
> >> doesn't work on the 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT
> >>
> >> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> >> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> >> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> >> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> >> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2013/7/10 Rick Curtis <curtisr7@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> > I'm not 100% certain that I'm following your scenario, but I worked
> on a
> >> > JIRA[1] a while back that sounds pretty similar.
> >> >
> >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2285
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Rick
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> > <rmannibucau@gmail.com>wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > >
> >> > > with a colleague we noticed today this behavior:
> >> > >
> >> > > 1) we activated the L2 cache
> >> > > 2) we have an entity Foo with a relationship 1-n in eager mode
> >> > > 3) we test the cache is correctly use
> >> > >      a) we call em.find(Foo.class, id) -> entity is cached but
not
> the
> >> > > relationship so a query is generated for each find
> >> > >      b) if we replace the em.find() by a query "select by id" all
> >> works
> >> > > fine (cache is used and we don't see any query then)
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Any idea?
> >> > >
> >> > > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> >> > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> >> > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> >> > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> >> > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> >> > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > *Rick Curtis*
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Rick Curtis*
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Rick Curtis*
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message