openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: release 2.3.x
Date Tue, 30 Jul 2013 14:03:42 GMT
Hi

No tomee setup had issues
Le 30 juil. 2013 15:19, "Kevin Sutter" <kwsutter@gmail.com> a écrit :

> Hi Romain,
> You have had a TCK issue with OpenJPA for 3 days?  With trunk?  But, it was
> clean 4 days ago?  Hmmm...  We haven't noticed any TCK failures...  Can you
> provide some more details?  Thanks.
>
> Kevin
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> <rmannibucau@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > We have an issue for 3 days but the snapshot of 4 days ago passed
> > Le 27 juil. 2013 15:31, "Mark Struberg" <struberg@yahoo.de> a écrit :
> >
> > > I can roll a release, but I have not run the TCK. But I assume it gets
> > run
> > > during the daily tomee CI run anyway.
> > >
> > > LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com>
> > > To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
> > > Cc:
> > > Sent: Friday, 26 July 2013, 18:13
> > > Subject: Re: release 2.3.x
> > >
> > > Hi Romain,
> > > Yeah, once we figured out the source of the one change you were
> > interested
> > > in, I guess this fell off the radar.  I'd be in favor of a 2.3.0
> release,
> > > but I personally don't have the cycles right at the moment.  Any other
> > > takers from our development community?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > <rmannibucau@gmail.com>wrote:
> > >
> > > > up?
> > > >
> > > > is the 2.3.0 ready to be release? we would like to get it in tomee
> and
> > we
> > > > are still waiting for fixes/updates to get released :(.
> > > >
> > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> > > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> > > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> > > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> > > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> > > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/5/22 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > > no since it was fixed on trunk
> > > > >
> > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> > > > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> > > > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> > > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> > > > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> > > > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2013/5/22 Pinaki Poddar <ppoddar@apache.org>
> > > > >
> > > > >> > the criteria api bug where only a single groupby or having
was
> > used
> > > > (",
> > > > >> "
> > > > >> was missing when the jpql was created)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> did you file a JIRA?
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> -----
> > > > >> Pinaki Poddar
> > > > >> Chair, Apache OpenJPA Project
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> View this message in context:
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/release-2-3-x-tp7583967p7583996.html
> > > > >> Sent from the OpenJPA Developers mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message