Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rmannibucau@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.220.170 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CABH8ernQisgUew_OM7GG_oYe9Ck4F7ORNxcxEeFagPzphqDHag@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CACLE=7NFV6AnZTnpyEb+-v_2Zi+BHPNTYoHiWkRHmdupemcBtg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABH8ern4ZRUn77_8Or6pEXMBP6gZ4fpFYQhhNgRnwEr19dVxAA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACLE=7M5XefXPRrwbeMoLQwLW9tSNHmyrVtH+K6-0zqVXcnDZw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABH8er=TKpdOAJ4mLHmuJ+Cw=gpa2FNu1CJv1eyo9iEaw0JPiA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABH8er=XB2Jw+Quo9Bedv50twnSWFKggfCk2ef23ou5JRusDSg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACLE=7PG027uR2o7wJcOdsnoh2nTWhT35WuGJcbqbXDhD_6VWA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABH8ernQisgUew_OM7GG_oYe9Ck4F7ORNxcxEeFagPzphqDHag@mail.gmail.com>
From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 15:23:36 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CACLE=7NZQt8PjMUeH9XBG+0sfCb3m7WN37eY29wF3KBWeoMk5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: release 2.3.x
To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f9219367e297904dd3a5c56

--e89a8f9219367e297904dd3a5c56
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

that's this commit
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openjpa-commits/201303.mbox/%3C20=
130314175917.E7B1823888E7@eris.apache.org%3E

no idea if a jira is linked or not :(

*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.co=
m/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*


2013/5/21 Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com>

> HI Romain,
> Sorry, I'm a little slow this morning...  :-)
>
> "Should be the same..."  Same as what?  The JIRA I found related to the
> Criteria API and GroupBy processing was still open with no commits to tru=
nk
> or any other release.  So, that JIRA didn't fix your issue...  Do you kno=
w
> if there was a specific JIRA for this issue?  Or, was it a case that you
> just ran into this issue, tried it on trunk, and the problem no longer
> existed?  If that's the case, then I'll probably need more detail from yo=
u
> on the specific scenario you were running so that we might narrow down
> which JIRA helped you for this particular case.
>
> Thanks again,
> Kevin
>
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> <rmannibucau@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > Should be the same, i got the issue on an app and checked out trunk and
> saw
> > it was fixed.
> > Le 20 mai 2013 21:24, "Kevin Sutter" <kwsutter@gmail.com> a =E9crit :
> >
> > > Romain,
> > > I guess I wasn't clairvoyant...  :-)  The ASM one was easy to find.
>  But,
> > > the one I was thinking of for the Criteria bug is still open, so I
> doubt
> > > that's the one you were referring to.  Can you look up the JIRA you
> were
> > > referring to?  Thanks!
> > >
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks, Romain.  I am familiar with the items you referenced.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > rmannibucau@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> basically 2 features (if you need jira number just ask i'll try to
> > find
> > > >> them back):
> > > >>
> > > >> - ASM "facade" to be able to use xbean asm shade instead of asm.ja=
r
> > > >> (blocking for tomee if not in the box)
> > > >> - the criteria api bug where only a single groupby or having was
> used
> > > (",
> > > >> "
> > > >> was missing when the jpql was created)
> > > >>
> > > >> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> > > >> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> > > >> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> > > >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> > > >> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> > > >> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> 2013/5/20 Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com>
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi Romain,
> > > >> > We currently don't have any plans for cutting a 2.3.0 release...
>  A
> > > few
> > > >> of
> > > >> > us actually discussed it a couple of weeks back, but we didn't
> come
> > up
> > > >> with
> > > >> > enough "features" to warrant a 2.3.0 release.  Do you have a lis=
t
> of
> > > the
> > > >> > JIRAs that you have an interest in?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > If there are other users of trunk that would like to see a 2.3.0
> > > >> release,
> > > >> > please voice your interest.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks,
> > > >> > Kevin
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > >> > <rmannibucau@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Hi guys,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > any plan to release 2.3.0?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > basically i'd like to get rid of openejb shade for next tomee
> > > release
> > > >> > (and
> > > >> > > some other fixes in 2.3.x would be great to integrate).
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > I updated tomee snapshot to use the openjpa snapshot to see if
> we
> > > have
> > > >> > any
> > > >> > > side effect but having some inputs to know if a release could =
be
> > > done
> > > >> > soon
> > > >> > > would be great.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> > > >> > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> > > >> > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> > > >> > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> > > >> > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> > > >> > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

--e89a8f9219367e297904dd3a5c56--