Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of allee8285@gmail.com designates
 209.85.223.174 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CABH8erm=PQ=cwQMh83XEWSxaq0Y2v4OthOT9z+COMJ7-A+WKQA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CABH8erm=PQ=cwQMh83XEWSxaq0Y2v4OthOT9z+COMJ7-A+WKQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:20:27 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAON=uekMcV72LfWzXESyf4UXf68L9+JE8pLa8k3fLKEwiLTR5A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrade to use ASM 4 for our post-enhancement
 processing
From: Albert Lee <allee8285@gmail.com>
To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f6464eb9db11b04cce2e720

--e89a8f6464eb9db11b04cce2e720
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

If the upgrade actually can proactively correct Java 7 related problems. I
have no objection for the move.

Albert.

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> Some of you may have noticed a recent JIRA I opened up:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2283
>
> I created this for upgrading our current usage of ASM 3.2 to ASM 4.0.
> OpenJPA uses ASM for some post-enhancement processing to clean up the stack
> map tables that are required for Java 7 validation.  Since ASM 4 has more
> complete support for Java 7, I thought it would be an easy,
> preventative-care type of move.
>
> As my JIRA indicates, I have run into a couple of hiccups with this move
> that I am still working through.
>
> But, in general, does anybody have a concern with this upgrade?  I'm only
> looking to do trunk at the moment.  But, if we continue to hit Java 7
> validation errors in 2.2.x, then I might consider moving it back to 2.2.x
> as well.
>
> Thanks for any input,
> Kevin
>


-- 
Albert Lee.

--e89a8f6464eb9db11b04cce2e720--