From dev-return-19592-apmail-openjpa-dev-archive=openjpa.apache.org@openjpa.apache.org Wed Oct 12 18:49:52 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 10DBF78C2 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:49:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38069 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2011 18:49:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 38032 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2011 18:49:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 38024 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2011 18:49:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:49:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kwsutter@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.174] (HELO mail-ey0-f174.google.com) (209.85.215.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:49:46 +0000 Received: by eye27 with SMTP id 27so1425286eye.33 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:49:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=cu1s8zxgJhek5gDmIePGykJjUIHBC0M+7CZjI1TxhPs=; b=dpIb+j9feJ4wWiTCDT66JOO/3TtkaIl/2JDsU0tm/SD285ao1cceCCWtTpTIHBapHa EmGxxGGVGExhRhrZ8bSudi+8Z0wO8t6cc/wYrghSUhR65/a0hXZN2imG1RdaniX7yfFT Dj2ihYzPIjDf1GrJA9ghJdEZN6Xl9XbmRRE+Y= Received: by 10.14.11.166 with SMTP id 38mr16831eex.244.1318445365170; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:49:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.186.1 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:49:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1318436080290-6885650.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1318436080290-6885650.post@n2.nabble.com> From: Kevin Sutter Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:49:05 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] JDO usage end-of-life? To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364d22b1a592d604af1e7b35 --0016364d22b1a592d604af1e7b35 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Pinaki Poddar wrote: > > d) The reported error that prompted this discussion is not a critical > failure. Possibly could be fixed with moderate effort. It does not seem to > indicate that we should throw JDO under the bus. > That reported error just jogged my memory. That error has nothing directly to do with my proposal to jettison JDO. > > ----- > Pinaki Poddar > Chair, Apache OpenJPA Project > -- > View this message in context: > http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/DISCUSS-JDO-usage-end-of-life-tp6876837p6885650.html > Sent from the OpenJPA Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > --0016364d22b1a592d604af1e7b35--