Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-19468-apmail-openjpa-dev-archive=openjpa.apache.org@openjpa.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7AD3982CE
	for <apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:44:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 35409 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2011 15:44:46 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@openjpa.apache.org
Received: (qmail 35362 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2011 15:44:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@openjpa.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@openjpa.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@openjpa.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.openjpa.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openjpa.apache.org
Received: (qmail 35354 invoked by uid 99); 16 Aug 2011 15:44:45 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:44:45 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of curtisr7@gmail.com designates
 209.85.215.170 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.215.170] (HELO mail-ey0-f170.google.com)
 (209.85.215.170)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:44:37 +0000
Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so40195eyd.15
        for <dev@openjpa.apache.org>; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 08:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=X/tPi41Xc9YAQa5a/Ka69jlXUbkWBLJsEeXsEhvqgS8=;
        b=p6tDrU8vfwhY+QTU/fr8xAi9jJgQ0rJL3fiparBwc85BhKy+unEZbmXwyBicICS6mg
         ePzSGdpPUO7e9xKAA55DWeqQgcCX3pud2x1SK9KklvApwqZeFi8EH+kjpBavAzkdgzRE
         rg0RWP1qfbj5mcM5mfRfc6OIXJg1/kXdzbHjU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.213.10.2 with SMTP id n2mr899499ebn.45.1313509457514; Tue, 16
 Aug 2011 08:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.213.105.131 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 08:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1313509268206-6691817.post@n2.nabble.com>
References: 
 <667336011.25587.1313013927123.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org>
	<460947163.41305.1313503890648.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org>
	<1313509268206-6691817.post@n2.nabble.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 10:44:17 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAP=qHCu_6krvPzt5d4GxB1_d+0F833Aasx=a=bksXZ8E3-36bQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (OPENJPA-2039) FKs for EAGER fields that are
 not in the current fetchplan aren't selected
From: Rick Curtis <curtisr7@gmail.com>
To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174bde6e9fd05004aaa140ab
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--0015174bde6e9fd05004aaa140ab
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Clear as mud.... ship it!

Thanks for the help Pinaki.

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Pinaki Poddar <ppoddar@apache.org> wrote:

> Rick,
>   Does something like this make sense?
>
>    /**
>     * Affirms if foreign key for a relation field will be pre-fetched as
> part of the owning object irrespective
>     * of whether the field is included in the default fetch group of this
> fetch configuration.
>     * <br>
>     * By default, foreign key for a relation field is pre-fetched as part
> of the owning object <em>only</em>
>     * if the field in included in the default fetch group of this fetch
> configuration.
>     *
>     * @since 2.2.0
>     */
>    public boolean getIgnoreDfgForFkSelect();
>
>
> -----
> Pinaki Poddar
> Chair, Apache OpenJPA Project
> --
>



-- 
*Rick Curtis*

--0015174bde6e9fd05004aaa140ab--