Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36234 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2010 13:59:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Nov 2010 13:59:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 14563 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 13:59:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 14408 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 13:59:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 14395 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2010 13:59:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 13:59:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of michael.d.dick@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.174] (HELO mail-gx0-f174.google.com) (209.85.161.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 13:59:48 +0000 Received: by gxk23 with SMTP id 23so1452020gxk.33 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 06:59:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=majKy0UTmA486hixzs4gwPK9ds4I0FPdu2R2+QOK7a4=; b=hSxln1Uxl8oN+LmStnbpwFjxRYb2gqoznufV48FEC1sV389ug6/JcYbrIEwCdbE5J9 0F/dowOj9XN13PJTT0kARY3YXqnKG/Fw8Gkr5A9DlVqaWDqM558QX5xfTYXsJKuwX369 98bc09266E+loPMi1OsrsKdsyXcfWBBhiCCDY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=Ix5HnweV3lNx8T3yxVqgVH+fMsvLHLeP2XdjNZKJvrpFYCmqLKr9dpEyn7KriVXqLK zHvNGv5ARDCj3B+8ariS/N+N7GvD8vWi6WreoRakcgN2cVKnjWh3GN1TXxvvMZfLiZ6O le6CAgd3YwYYXduJ2aqTP9p8aGEtaPZaIw9ok= Received: by 10.90.4.5 with SMTP id 5mr1221231agd.125.1288879167633; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 06:59:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.90.2 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 06:59:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1288738276324-5699462.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1288600698093-5693069.post@n2.nabble.com> <1288738276324-5699462.post@n2.nabble.com> From: Michael Dick Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 08:59:07 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: StoreManager flush To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363108ebf1f9a204943a90f5 --0016363108ebf1f9a204943a90f5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Glad I could help. Good luck, and let us know how it goes. Most of the infrastructure for a non relational store should be in place - I believe Kodo did something similar (OpenJPA was based on Kodo). -mike On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:51 PM, idan wrote: > > Hey thanks for the help. > > I'm implementing my own StoreManager since my data store is not a > relational > one > and has a pojo based API. > > My data store does have a JDBC driver but implementing my own StoreManager > will give me better performance and better handling for relationships. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/StoreManager-flush-tp5693069p5699462.html > Sent from the OpenJPA Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > --0016363108ebf1f9a204943a90f5--