openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Rohit Dilip Kelapure (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (OPENJPA-1824) OpenBooks should used container managed persistence when deployed in an application server.
Date Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:16:24 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Rohit Dilip Kelapure updated OPENJPA-1824:
------------------------------------------


The way OpenBooks build dependencies are setup, one cannot inject an emf/PersistenceContext
without modifying the pom.xml to pull in JEE apis. Therefore submitting a patch for this issue
is difficult as it necessitates making changes to the build. 

Ideally I would like to make ServiceFactory a stateless EJB and Inject a PersistenceContext
in a server JEE environment so that one could get a server manged emf rather than creating
one explicitly through Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory...

>From Pinaki Poddar .....
the PersistenceService should more be like a delegation than an inheritence 
-then you can create a 'business service' and inject a EMF into it easier 
-whether that EMF itself is injected by a JEE container or hand-constructed in JSE 
-will be orthogonal to the 'business service' 
-that just needs a EMF and somehow expects a session-per-thread model 

--- OpenBooks design constraint is that a business serivice must compile without JEE libs
--- 


> OpenBooks should used container managed persistence when deployed in an application server.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENJPA-1824
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1824
>             Project: OpenJPA
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: samples
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.1
>         Environment: Windows Sever 2003
>            Reporter: Rohit Dilip Kelapure
>            Priority: Minor
>
> OpenBooks is using an app managed persistence context and it isn't cleaning up properly.
openbook.server.ServiceFactory.getService(...) creates an EMF, but it is never closed.
> OpenBooks application is using an app managed persistence context which is NOT cleaned
up correctly when deployed in a JEE server.
> This results in the JEE container JPA Runtime does NOT calling DataCacheManager.close()
on the DataCacheManager plugin.
> The container JPA Runtime does NOT call openjpa.DataCacheManager.close() when the application
is stopped.
> This does not give a chance to any OpenJPA L2 cache provider to cleanup their resources
and remove cache instances from static hashmaps. utlimately resulting in a memory leak.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message