Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 32939 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2010 14:50:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Sep 2010 14:50:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 74004 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2010 14:50:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 73636 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2010 14:50:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 73626 invoked by uid 99); 22 Sep 2010 14:50:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:50:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kwsutter@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.46 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.46] (HELO mail-bw0-f46.google.com) (209.85.214.46) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:50:19 +0000 Received: by bwz11 with SMTP id 11so663037bwz.33 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 07:49:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=OAyuQfRi+j5OK4ic+saRdc7nrEH/qPP5M+pnb8JRHwQ=; b=Ec7lSkFTuoWBjcdLR9dR5FSGGeSpHgAQuF8P9NXKAzEo+E9wqJDLzN1V+kUVZOPqHX Do5Xa3/O2OyXmHQxlMuIGUGZLJknVpHwS9Jz351EfByv8rBB8U/rz/RIx1Ni3Dk9mAEN mEYCNmUhpJUnvHaJ94sQl3W7SKegjEfzX2geM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=F8t4BTpEB4W6NcYCTSCj8SeEp8qo+66Ei98wR9199CkdpbP0uyi8wpwp0tae9Hv6Be 14In++IRVmLEL+gz78nSIQZ/gHbDjq9z91UiC0oaAE5X19DwD/6hLmkIrFVNNXY00got 9GlkOTr0UauaDkRkfID+3KKl08YSR72HVWg/Q= Received: by 10.204.82.136 with SMTP id b8mr197471bkl.38.1285166999242; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 07:49:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.49.132 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 07:49:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Kevin Sutter Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:49:38 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Enforcer rules within Eclipse To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d641b37789210490da42df X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d641b37789210490da42df Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 To be honest, I don't know how I cleaned it up, but this Eclipse Enhancer error is now gone. I had been using the m2eclipse plugin and thinking that maybe I needed to upgrade, I tried to upgrade to version 0.10. Unfortunately, this required the removal of 0.9.8. When I tried to uninstall 0.9.8, I got several popup errors about OOM and NPE errors -- which then required a restart of Eclipse. After several restarts due to continued experimentation, my build environment is now clean... And, I'm still using 0.9.8 of the m2eclipse plugin... Go figure... Kevin On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Kevin Sutter wrote: > Hi, > I'm getting an error within Eclipse concerning Enforcer rules. > > Description Resource Path Location Type > Some Enforcer rules have failed. Look above for specific messages > explaining why the rule failed. TRUNK-openjpa-lib line 1 Maven > Problem > > I know about enforcing the maven level and the java levels, but all of my > TRUNK-openjpa-* projects have the same IBM JDK 6 specified. For some > reason, openjpa-lib doesn't like the Enforcer rules specified. Is there a > minimum JDK 6 level that is required? Everything builds just fine from the > command line. Any ideas? Thanks. > > Kevin > --0016e6d641b37789210490da42df--