Thanks Donald!

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Donald Woods <dwoods@apache.org> wrote:

> OK, updated builds in r953040 to only run apache-rat against certain
> source files under the /src/ dirs during the normal builds and only runs
> the more detailed checks during release builds -
>
> +                    <includes>
> +                        <!-- only check common source files -->
> +                        <include>**/src/**/*.bat</include>
> +                        <include>**/src/**/*.css</include>
> +                        <include>**/src/**/*.html</include>
> +                        <include>**/src/**/*.java</include>
> +                        <include>**/src/**/*.js</include>
> +                        <include>**/src/**/*.jsp</include>
> +                        <include>**/src/**/*.properties</include>
> +                        <include>**/src/**/*.sh</include>
> +                        <include>**/src/**/*.txt</include>
> +                        <include>**/src/**/*.vm</include>
> +                        <include>**/src/**/*.xml</include>
> +                    </includes>
>
>
> On 6/9/10 10:57 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
> > I'll look at changing the RAT usage in normal builds to use an
> > <includes> list, to only include "source" type files and leave the
> > normal exhaustive check using <excludes> to the release profile....
> >
> >
> > -Donald
> >
> >
> > On 6/9/10 10:07 AM, Michael Dick wrote:
> >> I'm in the same boat. I tend to save the output of svn diff to the
> >> development root directory when I'm switching to a different issue /
> task.
> >>
> >> It's certainly possible to selectively skip the rat check - if we make
> some
> >> changes to pom.xml. It's just going to defer the build problem until
> someone
> >> else does a build.
> >>
> >> A better fix would be to request an update to RAT such that it only
> checks
> >> files which are in version control - or optionally accepts an exclude
> list
> >> from a file ( we could then populate the file with output from svn
> stat).
> >>
> >> There may be other options too, but I'd try the RAT route first -
> especially
> >> if more people are affected by this change.
> >>
> >> -mike
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Rick Curtis <curtisr7@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Now that rat runs as part of my local builds, is there some way that I
> can
> >>> disable it via a system property? I have numerous files in my dev
> >>> environment that doesn't have an ASF license header and I have no
> >>> intentions
> >>> on ever checking this stuff in.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Rick
> >>>
> >>
> >
>