Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 92048 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 16:06:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 16:06:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 6837 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 16:06:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 6809 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 16:06:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 6801 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 16:06:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:06:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of michael.d.dick@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.24] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:06:18 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so1292821qwb.57 for ; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:05:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:received:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=r7kZW8eQOwlt2AXpSZvfhv+RFzNKxOx8UuLuanPjckI=; b=t1N4Je2VavmkY9mTeQd+m0rvvotsn/zi/hNBHLAZ2zq0F1eB1khhVlyToysdYY/eBJ DrxTU2M70A4N4oceLu6OB94OzhoJsnqE9DlRPe51Z2YwaJ3PUVr64FnNXkjHpZHNsK/v 232z3eiM775NkJjb/bsQLxMuQQ+SxswxgCFb4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:from:date:x-google-sender-auth :message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=XQ+/BsY67Rdzff3YRfa6clZYjCAMaTlX19DR8gPOGt1yBcTQ1txz8ykJ0UDNRp949x cSKJ5hHgF637r28X/FQeW9M7qfMPhTqrlEkAmH5mcpdFc+Usuf8xpJX/ekxdTk8TSi1F e3X84Yf/fJYPa+6Kbkbwt+24F3RuvnssIJxsE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: michael.d.dick@gmail.com Reply-To: mikedd@apache.org Received: by 10.229.41.197 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 09:05:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Dick Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:05:37 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 54bdbfed8afabb10 Received: by 10.229.213.140 with SMTP id gw12mr206783qcb.96.1270829157316; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:05:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: [DISCUSS] localized trace messages To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163630f4457e01330483cff8cb X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00163630f4457e01330483cff8cb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Rick, Kevin and Albert started a discussion about trace messages based on Ricks patch for 1604. The discussion warrants its own thread. FTR I agree with Rick. For logging we should localize the message (warnings, info, etc.), for trace localization is rarely beneficial and can be a detriment. If there is a use case for localized trace I'd be interested in hearing it though. -mike --00163630f4457e01330483cff8cb--