Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
Message-ID: <28583295.15411272309991947.JavaMail.jira@thor>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:26:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Heath Thomann (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Updated: (OPENJPA-1440) Allow COUNT(*) instead of
 COUNT(t0.id) for simple queries as an option
In-Reply-To: <591101091.1261420578497.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Heath Thomann updated OPENJPA-1440:
-----------------------------------

    Attachment:     (was: OPENJPA-1440-1.2.x.patch.txt)

> Allow COUNT(*) instead of COUNT(t0.id) for simple queries as an option
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENJPA-1440
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1440
>             Project: OpenJPA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Pinaki Poddar
>            Assignee: Pinaki Poddar
>             Fix For: 2.0.0-beta
>
>
> SQL generated for "select p for PObject p" is SELECT COUNT(t0.id) FROM POBJECT t0". This is valid and according to JPQL spec which does not accept COUNT(*).
> However, JDBC Drivers for legacy databases may not always support COUNT(columnName) as reported in [1].
> OpenJPA should support such cases with a boolean option DBDictionary.useWildCardForCount.
> [1] http://n2.nabble.com/COUNT-t-to-COUNT-tc4176827.html#a4176827

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.