openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Albert Lee <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] localized trace messages
Date Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:13:13 GMT
I am for Rick's argument. It is just the use of localized message in TRACE
are not consistent. I noticed that there are trace records that are
localized and some are not, so just want to get a consensus of what we
should target to do and what / if any action we need to reconcile the

Albert Lee.

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Michael Dick <> wrote:

> Rick, Kevin and Albert started a discussion about trace messages based on
> Ricks patch for
> 1604<
> >.
> The discussion warrants its own thread.
> FTR I agree with Rick. For logging we should localize the message
> (warnings,
> info, etc.), for trace localization is rarely beneficial and can be a
> detriment.
> If there is a use case for localized trace I'd be interested in hearing it
> though.
> -mike

Albert Lee.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message