openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Donald Woods (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (OPENJPA-1097) Detachment processing of our proxied mutable types (Date, Timestamp, etc) needs to be consistent
Date Sat, 06 Mar 2010 04:11:27 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Donald Woods updated OPENJPA-1097:
----------------------------------

    Attachment: OPENJPA-1097-12x.diff

Initial patch for 1.2.x to fix clear() not unproxying JavaTypes.OBJECT fields.

> Detachment processing of our proxied mutable types (Date, Timestamp, etc) needs to be
consistent
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENJPA-1097
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1097
>             Project: OpenJPA
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: jpa
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.2, 1.3.0, 2.0.0-M1
>            Reporter: Kevin Sutter
>            Assignee: Donald Woods
>             Fix For: 1.2.3, 1.3.0, 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: OPENJPA-1097-12x.diff, OPENJPA-1097-13x.diff, OPENJPA-1097-tests.diff,
OPENJPA-1097-trunk.diff, OPENJPA-1097.patch
>
>
> Per the discussion on our forums [1], there seems to some consistent issues with how
we perform detachment processing of the mutable types such as Date, Timestamp, etc.  There
seems to be a couple of issues (at least)...
> o  Detachment processing is not consistent between the detach() method and the clear()
method.
> o  Tracking of changes on a detached entity, but still allow it to be serialized without
requiring the openjpa jar file.
> [1]  http://n2.nabble.com/Date-Problem-td2943310.html#a2943310

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message