From dev-return-13848-apmail-openjpa-dev-archive=openjpa.apache.org@openjpa.apache.org Mon Sep 28 21:43:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 26071 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2009 21:43:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Sep 2009 21:43:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 29639 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2009 21:43:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 29592 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2009 21:43:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 29573 invoked by uid 99); 28 Sep 2009 21:43:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:43:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of allee8285@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.24] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:43:30 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so1560095qwi.57 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:43:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=tEqBzSQTOY9w9nh3BIxvIPlLXqBuOE4zACcs1VUv7sc=; b=YRgNpgQ8rCuuAeh6eHlpRVvZZFHouBENk7tGaUnZJc1JUdSosa7oh74+3MeCMfjTCU QE3VIyvs7av9BkiYOoq5w+9bJPeqbuOSEUWJFtjQmTeb91CgY2vMsRd2uf8jaGC9xI1/ BM1RUPwNAjI1SAzK2QHrTbJ+O/DxItsqpIMKE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=YN9+iyRUDAtgKvLBe6r9CrrR1/W/FxpMwd8XD4Yf8ypofYXbNawnpRrHb/Pcu/xR5a TpodeHVhEUXij/nh+U+54DSr69eZzp0Za3sORhqByWEq/hUXvUjggaO7oe2t2IwImtxI evPYM3X4X4qB1xhm1UtwQmGF4IM1+7vZUWNqQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.78.105 with SMTP id j41mr3183141qak.371.1254174189074; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:43:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7262f25e0909281402h135b96f9h93ae9fc82ccb91d5@mail.gmail.com> References: <7262f25e0909281402h135b96f9h93ae9fc82ccb91d5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:43:09 -0500 Message-ID: <8e68c8e90909281443nda1bc11p2ba49984a3e1114b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: privileged checks and serp From: Albert Lee To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f99e10b06baab0474aa2fbc X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00c09f99e10b06baab0474aa2fbc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Patrick, Is there any specific call path in question? One of the path to verify if the privilege check is needed is to disable the do-privilege and run the test bucket with Java 2 security profile. If the tests run with no Java Security problem/exception, we should remove them for performance reason, otherwise, it is required to make sure it passes with the Java 2 security enabled. Albert Lee. On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote: > Hi, > > Why are the privileged checks required for various serp-related > operations? I'm wondering if I can get rid of them with some changes > to serp, and so am curious about what test cases I should be running. > > Thanks, > > -Patrick > > -- > Patrick Linskey > 202 669 5907 > -- Albert Lee. --00c09f99e10b06baab0474aa2fbc--