openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kevin Sutter <kwsut...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Upcoming 2.0 Milestone 3 release
Date Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:46:43 GMT
+1 to Mike's proposal.  Thanks!

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Jeremy Bauer <techhusky@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Donald,
>
> I like Mike's proposal.  Using PFD2 for the Geronimo spec API artifact
> indicates that it lines up with proposed final draft 2 of the spec and
> OpenJPA being named M3 clearly indicates the milestone release level.
>
> -Jeremy
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Michael Dick <mikedd@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Donald,
> > Thanks for all the work you've done to sort this out.
> >
> > For OpenJPA I'd prefer openjpa-2.0.0-M3. I don't see how adding PFD2 or
> EA8
> > would help there. There is no proposed draft for OpenJPA, and EA sounds
> too
> > much like SNAPSHOT to me.
> >
> > For the Geronimo jars I'm inclined to go with PFD2 (leaning towards the
> > latter), since there _is_ proposed final draft for the JPA spec. It also
> > conveys some meaning to other products which may include in the geronimo
> > spec but may not include OpenJPA.
> >
> > Just my two cents,
> > -mike
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Donald Woods <dwoods@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Once Iteration 11 is done this week, we plan on publishing a Milestone
> 3
> > >  release based on it next week.  In some email exchanges with Geir, it
> > looks
> > > like we have a new Apache/Sun agreement that will let us release
> > pre-final
> > > spec based artifacts to the normal release repos.  Given this, what
> does
> > > everyone think about the artifact naming?  Should we use the M3
> > designation
> > > for OpenJPA and the Geronimo JPA 2.0 spec?
> > >    openjpa-2.0.0-M3
> > >    geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0-M3
> > > Or would it be better to name the api based on the spec level it
> > > implemented?
> > >    geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0-PFD2
> > > Or just stay with the early access naming and drop the SNAPSHOT?
> > >    geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0-EA8
> > >
> > > Thoughts?  I'd like to start the spec api release over on the Geronimo
> > side
> > > no later than tomorrow, so we can hopefully have it published and ready
> > to
> > > consume in the OpenJPA M3 branch early next week.
> > >
> > >
> > > -Donald
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message