Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 53013 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2009 11:44:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Aug 2009 11:44:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 39559 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2009 11:44:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 39474 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2009 11:44:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 39464 invoked by uid 99); 15 Aug 2009 11:44:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Aug 2009 11:44:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Aug 2009 11:44:37 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E51D234C051 for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:44:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <995957459.1250336657057.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:44:17 -0700 (PDT) From: "Milosz Tylenda (JIRA)" To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (OPENJPA-1249) Rework Oracle LOB support MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Rework Oracle LOB support ------------------------- Key: OPENJPA-1249 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1249 Project: OpenJPA Issue Type: Improvement Components: jdbc Affects Versions: 1.3.0, 2.0.0 Reporter: Milosz Tylenda Priority: Minor We could probably get rid of the following Oracle-specific behaviour and code: - using non-embedded LOB handling when size of the value exceeds 4000 bytes/chars, - using empty LOB when persisting a null value. Chances are the above behaviour is not needed starting from Oracle 9 or 10. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.