Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
Message-ID: <1833492434.1250511734833.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 05:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Donald Woods (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-1245) Move locking tests to a separate
 module
In-Reply-To: <777484268.1250253915268.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12744033#action_12744033 ] 

Donald Woods commented on OPENJPA-1245:
---------------------------------------

Any reason why you created a new module under trunk for these instead of putting them under openjpa-integration?  I'd prefer not creating another trunk module just for one set of tests.....

> Move locking tests to a separate module
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENJPA-1245
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1245
>             Project: OpenJPA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: build / infrastructure
>            Reporter: Michael Dick
>            Assignee: Michael Dick
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Donald Woods first proposed this change but was met with some concerns [1]. 
> While it's not particularly pretty moving the tests would allow us to set different derby lock timeouts for persistence-jdbc tests which should speed execution. 
> [1] http://markmail.org/thread/eovueydeaihpyd2c

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.