openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael Dick (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-651) Disable dangerous "fallback enhancement", make openjpa.RuntimeUnenhancedClasses=unsupported the default
Date Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:47:07 GMT


Michael Dick commented on OPENJPA-651:

Pursuant to the vote [1] on the dev mailing list I'm planning on turning subclassing off by
default in trunk. 1.3.x may follow shortly.


> Disable dangerous "fallback enhancement", make openjpa.RuntimeUnenhancedClasses=unsupported
the default
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: OPENJPA-651
>                 URL:
>             Project: OpenJPA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: jpa, kernel, UnenhancedClasses
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.3, 1.1.0, 1.2.1, 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Michael Vorburger
>            Assignee: Michael Dick
> As discussed on the email thread 'Disable dangerous "fallback enhancement" how?' on
(e.g. on,
I hereby suggest that by default, OpenJPA behaves as if openjpa.RuntimeUnenhancedClasses=unsupported
was explicitly configured. 
> (Copy/paste) The fact that is still
an Open New Feature, with five open sub-tasks (so technically this development was never finished,
yet it's automatically activated and shows up in the official doc) and in e.g.
(and may be others?) there are bug reports which are probably only due to this, may support
my point of view?
> Craig (Craig.Russell@...) appears to support this proposed Improvement (judging from
his email lundi, 23. juin 2008 21:33 in same thread).
> I'd love to see this in 1.1.1. May be due to backward compatibility you jugde it would
be safer to put this in 1.2.0 only? - Or is too late and impossible to change this default
now? Hope not!
> PS: Workaround for 1.1.0 is openjpa.RuntimeUnenhancedClasses=unsupported (undocumented,

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message