openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael Dick (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Updated: (OPENJPA-1144) Improve support of key generator tables
Date Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:38:07 GMT


Michael Dick updated OPENJPA-1144:

    Remaining Estimate: 0h
     Original Estimate: 0h

I don't think table_name would trigger any of the reserved words checking. It's more likely
that we're checking for uniqueness and found the existing column then (erroneously) creating
a new column.

I'd have to look into it a bit more to test this hypothesis. Can you provide the persistence.xml
that you're using (or at least any configuration properties that you set)?

> Improve support of key generator tables
> ---------------------------------------
>                 Key: OPENJPA-1144
>                 URL:
>             Project: OpenJPA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.1
>         Environment: OS independent, at least on MS SQL Server and MySQL 5
>            Reporter: Michael Simons
>            Priority: Minor
>   Original Estimate: 0h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
> The annotation to tell OpenJPA there's a Table Generator:
>     @TableGenerator(name = "pkGenSessionConfig", table = "jdo_keygen", pkColumnName =
> "table_name", valueColumnName = "last_used_id", pkColumnValue = "session_config", allocationSize
> = 10)
>     @Id
>     @GeneratedValue(strategy=GenerationType.TABLE, generator="pkGenSessionConfig")
>     @Column(name="session_config_id", unique=true, nullable=false)
>     private int id;
> And here's the according SQL generated by OpenJPA:
> Unknown column 'TABLE_NAME0' in 'where clause' {prepstmnt 32845046 SELECT LAST_USED_ID
> jdo_keygen WHERE TABLE_NAME0 = ? FOR UPDATE [params=(String) session_config]} [code=1054,
> state=42S22]
> Fay Wang told us that the name "TABLE_NAME0" is created by OpenJPA because DBDictionary.getValidColumnName
returns  "table_name0" where we want "table_name".
> Obvisouly "table_name" is _not_ assumed to be a valid column name, but that is not quite
correct, because at least for the DBMS MySQL 5 and MS SQL Server it's legal. 
> Furthermore we would appreciate the possibility to influence what's assumed  a valid
name for columns, tables and so on.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message