Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of michael.d.dick@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.220.222 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=EEM3tbAQxFiiDrO16kucvsCT5AX47hyaQPOvqZc5Pk8L3CwarYjWoO3e1Jc0FKTUNb
         KNRk2tKcbRlGNUVIjs+Dw6O5Vpq3LoNlP4wJbkqNet8bkW5SFJgC8eGdWZZK44NsgrvH
         UzlG3o12tmWCUnPcUsZ7Zd3QoLt6UDq9euEkA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <349722.14702.qm@web27807.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
References: <349722.14702.qm@web27807.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 07:19:18 -0500
Message-ID: <72c1350f0904020519s1e747582g51cc97ef7fcd741@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: using the tmpClassLoader
From: Michael Dick <michael.d.dick@gmail.com>
To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5acf800c7300466917112

--001636c5acf800c7300466917112
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Mark,

I'm not sure which change in 1.2.1 would have affected the PCEnhancer in
this way. I've seen similar problems with the tmpClassLoader specifically
with the IBM JRE.  Setting tmpClassloader = false didn't cause any problems
for me.

-mike

On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:59 AM, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de> wrote:

>
> If you like to try it out you can download it from my git repo
>
> $> git clone http://ns1.backwork.net/git/openjpa-maven-plugin.git
>
> If there are no objections, then I'll commit the changes to the apache repo
> tomorrow.
>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de> schrieb am Do, 2.4.2009:
>
> > Von: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> > Betreff: using the tmpClassLoader
> > An: dev@openjpa.apache.org
> > Datum: Donnerstag, 2. April 2009, 9:40
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > I'm currently extending the openjpa-maven-plugin to be
> > useful for openjpa-1.2.1
> >
> > So while updating I had a problem with one of my projects
> > which uses the following structure:
> >
> > --+- pom.xml
> >   |-api/pom.xml
> >   |   \- public interface
> > MyEntityInterface {
> >   |         public
> > static enum MessageChannel { MMS, SMS };
> >   \-impl/pom.xml
> >       \- @Entity public class MyEntityImpl
> > {
> >             private
> > MessageChannel channel;
> >
> > In this case the PCEnhancer fails since openjpa-1.2.1 (no
> > problems with 1.2.0 and 1.1.0 though) since the enum
> > 'MessageChannel' cannot be found on the classpath.
> >
> > I now provide a 'tmpClassLoader' property in the
> > openjpa-maven-plugin which defaults to 'false' and like to
> > ask if this default is ok for most usecases, or if there are
> > any objections?
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>

--001636c5acf800c7300466917112--