openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jeremy Bauer (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-927) Fix definition of javax.persistence.query.timeout property
Date Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:37:56 GMT


Jeremy Bauer commented on OPENJPA-927:

Committed Dianne's patch (with modifications) under revisions 750112 750113 750115 750117.

> Fix definition of javax.persistence.query.timeout property
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: OPENJPA-927
>                 URL:
>             Project: OpenJPA
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: kernel
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Dianne Richards
>            Assignee: Dianne Richards
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>         Attachments: OPENJPA-927-trunk.patch, patch.txt
> This was originally reported by Pinaki in OPENJPA-849. It is being moved to this new
JIRA. Here's Pinaki's original comment:
>         queryTimeout.setLoadKey("javax.persistence.query.timeout");
>         queryTimeout.setDefault("-1");
>         queryTimeout.set(-1);
>         queryTimeout.setDynamic(true);
> does not seem kosher for the following reason:
> 1. loadKey is the key with which a property is loaded from configuration artifacts. At
this point of execution, no property has been *actually* loaded, they are merely being declared
to exist. Hence we should not be setting load key.
> 2. configuration declares a Value. But does not assign its value. So setting its value
to -1 does not look alright. Setting default value is OK.
> These issues gain significance in the light of the fact the configuration's hashcode
is the key to a factory in JNDI. And computation of hashcode depends on the actual value of
the Values.
> As an extreme example, assume two Configuration C1 and C2 nearly identical but differs
*only* in their query.timeout value. The requirement is hash code for C1 and C2 must not be
equal. And that is what Configuration.hashCode() ensures. But, because we are setting query
timeout to -1 (that is not what the user's p.xml sets) and it is marked as dynamic, in both
cases Configuration hashcode will treat query.timeout value to be -1 and will end up computing
same hashcode for C1 and C2.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message