Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 97195 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2009 22:04:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Feb 2009 22:04:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 35005 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2009 22:04:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 34983 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2009 22:04:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 34972 invoked by uid 99); 4 Feb 2009 22:04:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:04:34 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kwsutter@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.168 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.168] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.168) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:04:27 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 28so119160wfc.24 for ; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:04:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=QX4hzFy9vcDqpxoZD85fvq1GRmtmgxBleLuQwx9u2kY=; b=iCK3UbbhZmmcoRKDe5EXWbfyS9cfHw6mreSmeeFsivQUC6zMjYfZyoxtxH3+2M+N3u GTIh7BT29LlWfsRttpQ9ONjvZ8+lZpieRM95zFK+laoacaRAPT7wgkjROWPQ87atFGcE Ew1aOsnuJOSZ/VUWzIFB832nMgf9Kj8LyNnFA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=AEkeZU3E+QMr0UQHGT0aQkzX41SaVmdpn9W/G9BR5ohj866mIjcWWPK3NxzQvZzYU8 xqb3HdEiW6BZKS9Q6BYbzunaoUmXP3vCtEDITaurA+VJbBiM5wptyiLv8TByWbD9kByu U9kGoelNXFsZ3NPY0oTegrCUotOcQDV4gwZWs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.162.9 with SMTP id k9mr1674161wfe.309.1233785047246; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:04:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <72c1350f0902041402ndd92b8cp7ed06bf0de07718@mail.gmail.com> References: <669923715.1233769679617.JavaMail.jira@brutus> <498A0F2A.6000107@apache.org> <72c1350f0902041402ndd92b8cp7ed06bf0de07718@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:04:07 -0600 Message-ID: <89c0c52c0902041404n1b9dae81k95e12212ae1549f3@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [jira] Created: (OPENJPA-897) OpenJPA Documentaion should provide better navigation From: Kevin Sutter To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd150b678675904621ef774 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd150b678675904621ef774 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Yep, Firefox on Windows XP... On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Michael Dick wrote: > Seems to work for me - firefox on ubuntu 8.10 in case that matters. > > -mike > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Donald Woods wrote: > > > Is the left nav area working correctly for you? > > When I select "Part 2. Java Persistence API" the left frame changes, but > > not the right side.... > > > > > > -Donald > > > > > > > > Pinaki Poddar (JIRA) wrote: > > > >> OpenJPA Documentaion should provide better navigation > >> ----------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> Key: OPENJPA-897 > >> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-897 > >> Project: OpenJPA > >> Issue Type: Improvement > >> Reporter: Pinaki Poddar > >> > >> > >> Navigating from Table of Contents in OpenJPA web-based documentation is > >> not very user-friendly. On the chunked version, you click a topic link > in > >> TOC and you go to a new page altogether. > >> It can be easier if TOC topics always appeared in a left-sided > >> Navigational Panel. With my very limited skill on such matters, I have > >> assembled a draft solution based on HTML Frame. Given that HTML Frames > are > >> not always supported by a browser, the fallback option is what it used > to > >> be. > >> The changes can be found in [1,2]. > >> Because what is a 'user-friendly' navigation style of web-based document > >> is a pretty subjective choice, please check if you prefer this new style > or > >> not. > >> > >> If I hear lots of nays, the change will be rolled back. > >> > >> Even if the style is accepted, given my very limited knowledge of XSL, > >> HTML and other animals found in the web, some of you may suggest a much > >> better way of achieving the same purpose. > >> [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=740805 > >> [2] > >> > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/diffpagesbyversion.action?pageId=23626&originalVersion=19&revisedVersion=20 > >> > >> > >> > >> > --000e0cd150b678675904621ef774--