openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Craig Russell (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-694) @SecondaryTable expected behavior is INNER JOIN?
Date Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:13:44 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628060#action_12628060
] 

Craig Russell commented on OPENJPA-694:
---------------------------------------

I think that the JPA specification, currently under review for a new release, should address
this issue. Without an explicit standard way to specify inner or outer join behavior, applications
cannot be portable.

That said, the OpenJPA documentation should be updated so folks know what to expect. Can you
provide a patch?

> @SecondaryTable expected behavior is INNER JOIN?
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENJPA-694
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-694
>             Project: OpenJPA
>          Issue Type: Question
>          Components: docs, jpa
>         Environment: Any
>            Reporter: Geraldo Xexéo
>   Original Estimate: 0.25h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0.25h
>
> Hibernate explicitly defines the behavior of secondary tables. (such as in http://www.hibernate.org/hib_docs/annotations/api/org/hibernate/annotations/Table.html#fetch())
> I checked both the original JPA specification and many implementations and none of them
talks about the subject. Hibernate, however, has this in the documentation.
> Can you confirm it? It has a lot of side effects, for example:
> Can you answer on the implemented behavior and comment on my two examples?
> Should this be pointed to JPA specification responsibles?
> Thanks,
> xexeo

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message