openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael Vorburger (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-651) Disable dangerous "fallback enhancement", make openjpa.RuntimeUnenhancedClasses=unsupported the default
Date Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:45:44 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12631759#action_12631759
] 

Michael Vorburger commented on OPENJPA-651:
-------------------------------------------

No reactions to this in months... at least document this, see the OPENJPA-650 ?

> Disable dangerous "fallback enhancement", make openjpa.RuntimeUnenhancedClasses=unsupported
the default
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENJPA-651
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-651
>             Project: OpenJPA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: jpa, kernel
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.0
>            Reporter: Michael Vorburger
>
> As discussed on the email thread 'Disable dangerous "fallback enhancement" how?' on users@openjpa.apache.org
(e.g. on http://markmail.org/message/5e2yfcp3w3vhmrob?q=Disable+dangerous+%22fallback+enhancement%22+how%3F+list:org%2Eapache%2Eopenjpa%2Eusers),
I hereby suggest that by default, OpenJPA behaves as if openjpa.RuntimeUnenhancedClasses=unsupported
was explicitly configured. 
> (Copy/paste) The fact that https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-293 is still
an Open New Feature, with five open sub-tasks (so technically this development was never finished,
yet it's automatically activated and shows up in the official doc) and in e.g. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-444
(and may be others?) there are bug reports which are probably only due to this, may support
my point of view?
> Craig (Craig.Russell@Sun.COM) appears to support this proposed Improvement (judging from
his email lundi, 23. juin 2008 21:33 in same thread).
> I'd love to see this in 1.1.1. May be due to backward compatibility you jugde it would
be safer to put this in 1.2.0 only? - Or is too late and impossible to change this default
now? Hope not!
> PS: Workaround for 1.1.0 is openjpa.RuntimeUnenhancedClasses=unsupported (undocumented,
see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-650).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message