Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of plinskey@gmail.com designates
 64.233.166.183 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer;
        b=DetfO8T4KZK5jyRWqz2Q57Bw6s1is+qRFp7Z9HFlnZVyuUYB7cgip4eXx3+P9etHxCSs32qgbvSNPVFbEkKEBva2PA9dhY47N0GVLuo6uuzHNulD8a+w+wuPwnpcD81lUcrXej1UFpninIfgyOysNpbk1V+0l4Cay7Z5m2ICi2U=
Message-Id: <DE910F97-AA43-4232-BAA6-C80CB6337F23@gmail.com>
From: Patrick Linskey <plinskey@gmail.com>
To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <3346F722-BB99-4A31-B330-251F2FB8C410@SUN.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2)
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve OpenJPA 1.1.0 release
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 10:10:50 -0700
References: <592470C8-3549-4127-8BF2-9EEA0D0A09FE@gmail.com>
 <3346F722-BB99-4A31-B330-251F2FB8C410@SUN.com>

Hi,

> Nice job, but need a bit more to review.

Thanks! I'm assuming that you mean that you can't vote +1 now, but  
that you'll have time between now and Monday evening, right?

> There's a requirement that all artifacts have an md5 checksum in  
> addition to the asc signature.

Those should all be generated. In fact, it looks like we even have md5  
checksums of the signatures!

> Since we plan to put the jar files into the global maven repo, the  
> artifacts should be on the download site for review. The jar files  
> also need md5 and asc signatures.

Everything can be found at people.apache.org/www/openjpa.apache.org/ 
builds/1.1.0.

Also, I think it's worth noting that there are definite improvements  
that we could make in our staging / delivery process. I'd appreciate  
it if we didn't hold 1.1.0 hostage for those changes. My understanding  
from Wendy's comments about the last release process was that we  
needed more signatures; I believe that the new release is sufficiently- 
signed. If there are other improvements that we could make, I'm all  
for making them, but would rather see non-showstopping issues get  
logged and addressed in 1.1.1 etc.

-Patrick

On May 15, 2008, at 9:52 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:

> Hi Patrick,
>
> Nice job, but need a bit more to review.
>
> There's a requirement that all artifacts have an md5 checksum in  
> addition to the asc signature.
>
> Since we plan to put the jar files into the global maven repo, the  
> artifacts should be on the download site for review. The jar files  
> also need md5 and asc signatures.
>
> Craig
>
> On May 14, 2008, at 11:37 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
>
>> OpenJPA Developers-
>>
>> A candidate build for OpenJPA 1.1.0 is available at:
>>
>> http://openjpa.apache.org/builds/1.1.0/downloads/
>>
>> Please review these artifacts and signatures, and vote whether we
>> should release them as Apache OpenJPA version 1.1.0. Release notes
>> for this release are included in the artifact, or can be browsed at:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openjpa/branches/1.1.0/openjpa-project/RELEASE-NOTES.html
>>
>> The Apache Release Audit Tool has been run on the release, and no
>> missing licenses were found with the exceptions listed in the
>> exclusion section of the "rat-maven-plugin" configuration in http://
>> svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openjpa/branches/1.1.0/pom.xml .
>>
>> In accordance with http://www.apache.org/foundation/
>> voting.html#ReleaseVotes , three +1 votes will be sufficient to
>> approve the release for publication. While it is not possible to veto
>> a release, the vote will remain open for the standard 3 day period
>> (ending at 11:30pm Pacific on Monday 5/19) in order to allow people  
>> to
>> thoroughly review the release and perform whatever additional testing
>> they desire and raise any concerns or objections.
>>
>> A vote of "+1" means you approve of the release for publication, "-1"
>> means you do not approve, and a "+0" or "-0" means you are neutral.
>>
>> Thanks in advance for your diligence in helping to ensure that the
>> quality of the OpenJPA 1.1.0 release reflects the high quality of all
>> of its contributors!
>>
>> -Patrick
>>
>> -- 
>> Patrick Linskey
>> 202 669 5907
>>
>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>

-- 
Patrick Linskey
202 669 5907