From dev-return-8002-apmail-openjpa-dev-archive=openjpa.apache.org@openjpa.apache.org Fri May 02 03:56:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 78446 invoked from network); 2 May 2008 03:56:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 May 2008 03:56:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 91218 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2008 03:56:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 91188 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2008 03:56:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 91177 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2008 03:56:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 May 2008 20:56:36 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of catalina.wei@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.169] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 May 2008 03:55:51 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 28so1152675wfc.24 for ; Thu, 01 May 2008 20:56:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=idPiKTf9jGND+1XX82/ZagWiGiqbjITv5lgsiTlUHik=; b=HWp8+2Cfyxv124UxrF6QjU6cu52oYahgsul3ynxqrAP7teihOhvmZFi8WB+UozbcyTRXlt+IhehC1yqkUFaocJWOOlfmx9KEVx/Pjws8/R82WmBJakJh6HtciHYG0oF2F3Hw3Vgx1+fT1xU9VVvJoz3uzIgQO5gwu/8mouZOz5s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=qMkEtW3XUlcmgUYfB5W+MkrqKTCk738ewB1pv5OBO9iLWLWifSAGoeW7zjsx4WEZBgVZMF9KCV/bq/BnKZnkbaeLQRWHag63lmkHIOSccHnQFVSZ7mfWKoI0PRaa9CL6v5yY3teAPrzGCeUW5wEkvBw8wIctRJqj0AqodjA4tcY= Received: by 10.142.68.4 with SMTP id q4mr1067279wfa.319.1209700565230; Thu, 01 May 2008 20:56:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.211.16 with HTTP; Thu, 1 May 2008 20:56:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 20:56:05 -0700 From: "catalina wei" To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-477) making StoreManager more flexible and extensible. In-Reply-To: <1061650572.1209336055748.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_8357_3868128.1209700565248" References: <507928.1199494233834.JavaMail.jira@brutus> <1061650572.1209336055748.JavaMail.jira@brutus> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_8357_3868128.1209700565248 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi Patrick, We are still working on making JDBC LRS support extensible. If you think this issue should be marked as resolved, we could open another JIRA issue for the LRS extensibility. Catalina On 4/27/08, Patrick Linskey (JIRA) wrote: > > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12592688#action_12592688] > > Patrick Linskey commented on OPENJPA-477: > ----------------------------------------- > > Can this issue be marked as resolved? > > > making StoreManager more flexible and extensible. > > ------------------------------------------------- > > > > Key: OPENJPA-477 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-477 > > Project: OpenJPA > > Issue Type: Improvement > > Components: kernel > > Affects Versions: 1.0.2 > > Reporter: Daniel Lee > > Fix For: 1.1.0 > > > > Attachments: OPENJPA-477-trunk612523.patch, > OPENJPA-477.613332.patch > > > > > > The OpenJPA StoreManager needs some modifications to make it more > flexible and extensible. For example, some private methods and attributes > need to made either public or protected. The attached patch identifies the > areas that have been identified thus far. Please let me know if there are > any concerns. Many thanks in advance. > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > > ------=_Part_8357_3868128.1209700565248--