Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 33027 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2008 09:18:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Apr 2008 09:18:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 54688 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2008 09:18:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 54654 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2008 09:18:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 54643 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2008 09:18:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:18:08 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:17:15 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JqPUO-0008DS-14 for dev@openjpa.apache.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:17:36 -0700 Message-ID: <16934610.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:17:36 -0700 (PDT) From: rlv j To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Subject: License of enhanced or transformed code MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: Nathan.Johnson@RheinLand-Versicherungen.de X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org As I understand it, OpenJPA modifies your code (in the form of Java .class files) to add persistency abilities, presumably adding code from OpenJPA to the code being modified to create a combined work. Is this so, and is the resulting combination subject to the Apache License? I think it is something that users of OpenJPA in general should concern themselves with and it would be appropriate to feature in your documentation. Transformations to the classes are done even if the Enhancer isn't run on the .class files in advance of running, aren't they? I mailed apache.org regarding this, and recieved the response: >If the OpenJPA PMC had not already addressed this issue, then they should consult with our legal committee. I thank you much for your contribution to the community and in advance for your reply. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/License-of-enhanced-or-transformed-code-tp16934610p16934610.html Sent from the OpenJPA Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.