openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael Dick" <michael.d.d...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: JDK 1.4 support?
Date Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:03:22 GMT
+1 to discontinuing the 1.4 modules.

-Mike

On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com> wrote:

> If we do down this path, we should look at replacing (or enhancing) our
> UUID
> implementation with the UUID class that is now part of JDK 5 (
> http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/UUID.html).  I just heard
> from a user that the random number version of the UUID (version 4)
> provides
> for more efficient index processing.  This is part of the Java
> implementation.  We should take a look at that as an alternative.
>
> Kevin
>
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Patrick,
> > I would be +1 for getting rid of the JDK 1.4 requirement.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kevin
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Evan Ireland <eireland@sybase.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Sounds like a good plan, based on the JDK 1.4 EOL schedule.
> > >
> > > http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Patrick Linskey [mailto:plinskey@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: Sunday, 16 March 2008 12:06 p.m.
> > > > To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
> > > > Subject: JDK 1.4 support?
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > What do you guys think about discontinuing our JDK 1.4
> > > > support? I've made a few attempts to make our concurrent map
> > > > utilization pluggable to allow us to take advantage of the
> > > > JDK improvements in concurrency, but have had a hard time
> > > > doing so in the past. It occurs to me that one easy way to do
> > > > this would be to just get rid of JDK 1.4 support in OpenJPA
> > > > 1.1, which would let us switch directly to the Java 5
> > > > java.util.concurrent package, without requiring cumbersome
> > > > wrappers etc.
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts?
> > > >
> > > > -Patrick
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Patrick Linskey
> > > > 202 669 5907
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message