openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Patrick Linskey" <plins...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: OpenJPA Release Policy
Date Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:45:23 GMT
> * Major release - Should the major release parallels to the JPA spec
> numbering?

I don't think so. For JPA2, it's convenient to do so. But I don't
think that that will always be the case.

>   - application, with no source change, re-compiles in (n+1)th release can
> execute in (n)th release.

Just to clarify, you mean "application that executed in (n)th release
can re-compile in (n+1)th release", right?

-Patrick

On Feb 2, 2008 8:22 PM, Albert Lee <allee8285@gmail.com> wrote:
> * Major release - Should the major release parallels to the JPA spec
> numbering?
>
> * Backward compatibility - I just want clarifications on the following
> scenario:
>   - application compiled in (n)th release can execute in (n+1)th release
> without re-compilation.
>   - application, with no source change, re-compiles in (n+1)th release can
> execute in (n)th release.
>   - application, with source change that use new functions, re-compiles in
> (n+1)th release can only be executed in (n+1)th release.
>
> Thanks,
> Albert Lee.
>
>
> On Feb 2, 2008 5:40 PM, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@sun.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to formalize our release policy. Please take a look at
> > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=55076
> >  and comment.
> >
> > I'd like to remove the *DRAFT* status of the policy next week.
> >
> > Craig
> >
> > Craig Russell
> > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> > 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Albert Lee.
>



-- 
Patrick Linskey
202 669 5907

Mime
View raw message