[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12539270 ] 

Patrick Linskey commented on OPENJPA-370:
-----------------------------------------

> I take that your profiling has shown that the performance degradation
> is due to the changes introduced by this Issue? Can you share any more details?

We've seen a ~ 30% regression since an OpenJPA snapshot from a few months back. Rolling back this particular change cuts that to a 10% regression.

> LoadFetchGroup annotation was not recognized during the fetch1
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENJPA-370
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-370
>             Project: OpenJPA
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: kernel
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.1, 1.1.0
>            Reporter: Teresa Kan
>            Assignee: Teresa Kan
>             Fix For: 1.0.1, 1.1.0
>
>         Attachments: OPENJPA_370_2.patch, TestFetchGroup.zip
>
>
> Employee class has a LoadFetchGroup annotation defined on the Rating field, when getRating was called, the address should be returned also. However, openjpa did not handle the LoadFetchGroup correctly, therefore, address was not eargly fetched.
> public class FGEmployee{
>     @Id
>     private int id;
>  
>     @OneToOne(fetch=FetchType.LAZY) 
>     private FGAddress address;
>  
>     @Basic(fetch=FetchType.LAZY)
>     @LoadFetchGroup("AddressFetchGroup")
>     private String rating;
>  
>     @ManyToOne(fetch=FetchType.LAZY)
>     private FGManager manager;
> ..
> }

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.