Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kwsutter@gmail.com designates
 209.85.146.182 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=IwNI/D3ZNJVXrVS4Z4PnlTkKawhzu/YpNVAt4YCsl6i+s7XGGqK94dkdWQJ200sZj73Ti+0SxL9bpYGoEe7UOkMeTPcTyxG29G8Cmat0cTZ6LFQK95+cMccyvFPpMgtTkz9UNjrQCCKjohBgI8qz/ly825H04375LWJztKlCebY=
Message-ID: <89c0c52c0710040816u74fc532fk86702fa0ca1847ba@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 10:16:14 -0500
From: "Kevin Sutter" <kwsutter@gmail.com>
To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lazy loading not working.
In-Reply-To: <7262f25e0710040723x27a804d9o66b455d27ccbd743@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_29177_16925639.1191510974878"
References: <13022684.post@talk.nabble.com> <13030513.post@talk.nabble.com>
	 <13040881.post@talk.nabble.com>
	 <7262f25e0710040723x27a804d9o66b455d27ccbd743@mail.gmail.com>

------=_Part_29177_16925639.1191510974878
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 10/4/07, Patrick Linskey <plinskey@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> I believe that you can leave out the @Basic annotation for enums if
> you'd prefer, as well.


That is correct.  @Basic is optional for enums.

Kevin

-Patrick
>
> On 10/4/07, rgarret <RGARRET@co.pierce.wa.us> wrote:
> >
> > Alex,
> >
> > I am enhancing all of my model classes at build time. I found a fixed
> bug
> > that pertains to my issue:
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-347.
> > After upgrading to the latest snapshot my OneToOne relationship behaved
> > properly but the ManyToOne still eagerly fetched. I changed from
> ManyToOne
> > to Basic and now everything is working well.
> >
> > I'm not sure if declaring the relationship as basic is the right thing
> to do
> > as it really is ManyToOne. I have verified that retrieval works properly
> but
> > have yet to test persisting.
> >
> > Thanks for your help,
> > Reece
> >
> >
> > AlexD. wrote:
> > >
> > > Hallo,
> > >
> > > I hope that I'm right: you have to use Enhancement for this option...
> > >
> > > see
> > >
> http://openjpa.apache.org/docs/latest/manual/manual.html#ref_guide_pc_enhance
> > > for details.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Alex
> > >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Lazy-loading-not-working.-tf4562936.html#a13040881
> > Sent from the OpenJPA Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Patrick Linskey
> 202 669 5907
>

------=_Part_29177_16925639.1191510974878--