openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Albert Lee" <allee8...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r588002 - /openjpa/branches/1.0.x/openjpa-kernel/src/main/resources/org/apache/openjpa/enhance/localizer.properties
Date Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:09:52 GMT
I agree with Craig.  The "private" is referring to the setter "method", so
we should change "private property" to "private method".

Albert Lee.

On 10/24/07, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@sun.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> 1. I don't think the text is an improvement. What is a private
> property? Should it not be:
>
> +       Please create a setter method for this property which may be a
> private \
> +       method.
>
> or,
> -       Please create a setter method for this property (which may be
> private).
>
> Craig
>
> On Oct 24, 2007, at 1:22 PM, mikedd@apache.org wrote:
>
> > Author: mikedd
> > Date: Wed Oct 24 13:22:40 2007
> > New Revision: 588002
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=588002&view=rev
> > Log:
> > OPENJPA-413 committing for Teresa
> >
> > Modified:
> >     openjpa/branches/1.0.x/openjpa-kernel/src/main/resources/org/
> > apache/openjpa/enhance/localizer.properties
> >
> > Modified: openjpa/branches/1.0.x/openjpa-kernel/src/main/resources/
> > org/apache/openjpa/enhance/localizer.properties
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openjpa/branches/1.0.x/openjpa-
> > kernel/src/main/resources/org/apache/openjpa/enhance/
> > localizer.properties?rev=588002&r1=588001&r2=588002&view=diff
> > ======================================================================
> > ========
> > --- openjpa/branches/1.0.x/openjpa-kernel/src/main/resources/org/
> > apache/openjpa/enhance/localizer.properties (original)
> > +++ openjpa/branches/1.0.x/openjpa-kernel/src/main/resources/org/
> > apache/openjpa/enhance/localizer.properties Wed Oct 24 13:22:40 2007
> > @@ -128,7 +128,8 @@
> >       persistent properties must have getter methods.
> >  property-no-setter: No setter method found for persistent property
> > "{0}", and \
> >       bytecode analysis of the getter did not reveal a clear backing
> > field. \
> > -     Please create a setter method for this property (it may be
> private).
> > +     Please create a setter method for this property which may be a
> > private \
> > +     property.
> >  property-setter-getter-mismatch: Bytecode analysis of the setter
> > and getter \
> >       methods for persistent property "{0}" indicates that the two
> > methods \
> >       might be acting on different backing fields.  The setter method
> > assigns to \
> >
> >
>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message