openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kevin Sutter" <>
Subject Re: Change "connecting to dictionary" message from Info to Trace?
Date Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:21:58 GMT
Since there doesn't seem to be any dissent on this topic, I will go ahead
and open a JIRA issue to change this message to a Trace entry instead of an
Info entry.


On 10/18/07, Kevin Sutter <> wrote:
> Hi,
> Currently, we issue the following message as an Info message whenever we
> don't have enough configuration data to determine the proper dictionary to
> use.  The message seems to be overkill, especially when running within a
> Container environment and the use of <jta-data-source> and
> <non-jta-data-source> elements.  It's very confusing to our Application
> Server customers when they are using the JPA-defined constructs for
> accessing the jta and non-jta datasources.  The message makes it sound like
> they are missing some configuration, where in reality they have done
> everything right and we just need to query the datasource to determine the
> right dictionary to use.
> I can kind of understand it when using the openjpa.Connection* properties
> to define your datasources, but even then, do we need to log this as an Info
> message?
> connecting-for-dictionary: OpenJPA will now connect to the database to
> attempt \
>     to determine what type of database dictionary to use.  To prevent this
> \
>     connection in the future, set your openjpa.jdbc.DBDictionary \
>     configuration property to the appropriate value for your database (see
> \
>     the documentation for available values).
> Would there be any backlash if we changed this message to a Trace level
> message instead?
> Thanks,
> Kevin

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message