openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: svn commit: r588002 - /openjpa/branches/1.0.x/openjpa-kernel/src/main/resources/org/apache/openjpa/enhance/localizer.properties
Date Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:30:47 GMT
Hi Mike,

1. I don't think the text is an improvement. What is a private  
property? Should it not be:

+	Please create a setter method for this property which may be a  
private \
+	method.

or,
-	Please create a setter method for this property (which may be  
private).

Craig

On Oct 24, 2007, at 1:22 PM, mikedd@apache.org wrote:

> Author: mikedd
> Date: Wed Oct 24 13:22:40 2007
> New Revision: 588002
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=588002&view=rev
> Log:
> OPENJPA-413 committing for Teresa
>
> Modified:
>     openjpa/branches/1.0.x/openjpa-kernel/src/main/resources/org/ 
> apache/openjpa/enhance/localizer.properties
>
> Modified: openjpa/branches/1.0.x/openjpa-kernel/src/main/resources/ 
> org/apache/openjpa/enhance/localizer.properties
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openjpa/branches/1.0.x/openjpa- 
> kernel/src/main/resources/org/apache/openjpa/enhance/ 
> localizer.properties?rev=588002&r1=588001&r2=588002&view=diff
> ====================================================================== 
> ========
> --- openjpa/branches/1.0.x/openjpa-kernel/src/main/resources/org/ 
> apache/openjpa/enhance/localizer.properties (original)
> +++ openjpa/branches/1.0.x/openjpa-kernel/src/main/resources/org/ 
> apache/openjpa/enhance/localizer.properties Wed Oct 24 13:22:40 2007
> @@ -128,7 +128,8 @@
>  	persistent properties must have getter methods.
>  property-no-setter: No setter method found for persistent property  
> "{0}", and \
>  	bytecode analysis of the getter did not reveal a clear backing  
> field. \
> -	Please create a setter method for this property (it may be private).
> +	Please create a setter method for this property which may be a  
> private \
> +	property.
>  property-setter-getter-mismatch: Bytecode analysis of the setter  
> and getter \
>  	methods for persistent property "{0}" indicates that the two  
> methods \
>  	might be acting on different backing fields.  The setter method  
> assigns to \
>
>

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


Mime
View raw message