Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of catalina.wei@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.82.224 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=f5iwkS0zd+g9BswfKrX4xSo3BfBiIGWpY92T5sAYqB54Va68BIdmbAiT1xWmuDTkfnjLP6XVKBLbt92Rgsvc3OrbqOwK4ws/RPynKWl86ogIlRSR2FrEB1Ld/XBaT/bQQAhQj1t+cpxKsjgEQ/FLaQGeNMFcwGpH6Ddt88SMrN4=
Message-ID: <f374e8990708201720v27c21208n1cdcbf1980a9c1a2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:20:55 -0700
From: "catalina wei" <catalina.wei@gmail.com>
To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
Subject: Re: XML datatypes and data caching
In-Reply-To: <7262f25e0708201647hceafa68n14c8e8450eb21e8a@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_76576_689412.1187655655683"
References: <7262f25e0708201231rc10bb9bge1ba9053c15f5665@mail.gmail.com>
	 <f374e8990708201538v49f5d5b6rb7888c397c01aa04@mail.gmail.com>
	 <7262f25e0708201545i4c407792h94f53f7154093f9b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <f374e8990708201638n44b012bftaca0227b479ece7c@mail.gmail.com>
	 <7262f25e0708201647hceafa68n14c8e8450eb21e8a@mail.gmail.com>

------=_Part_76576_689412.1187655655683
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Patric,
Before commit, we have a copy of the old value in the cache.
The new value is updated in cache on commit().
So the changes only visible after commit.

Catalina


On 8/20/07, Patrick Linskey <plinskey@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Do we make a copy of the data in the cache? I.e., if you load some
> data so it gets into cache, then change something inside the XML
> graph, but do not commit, are the changes visible?
>
> -Patrick
>
> On 8/20/07, catalina wei <catalina.wei@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Patrick,
> > Right now the persistent field mapped to XML column is cached just like
> > other persist field when DataCache is turned on.
> >
> > Do we want to change this behavior  to not caching the xml  field value?
> > I don't understand why we want to prevent the xml field from getting
> into
> > cache.
> >
> > The same testcase in openjpa-persistence-jdbc ran OK with DataCache
> turned
> > on.
> >
> > Catalina
> >
> > On 8/20/07, Patrick Linskey <plinskey@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Great. If you could add a test case, that would be very helpful for
> > > ongoing verification.
> > >
> > > I think that initially, it is probably sufficient to just prevent
> > > these field types from getting into cache.
> > >
> > > -Patrick
> > >
> > > On 8/20/07, catalina wei <catalina.wei@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi Patrick,
> > > > I can verify this. I will post result shortly.
> > > >
> > > > Catalina
> > > > On 8/20/07, Patrick Linskey <plinskey@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Have we done any testing of the interaction between XML datatypes
> and
> > > > > the data cache?
> > > > >
> > > > > -Patrick
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Patrick Linskey
> > > > > 202 669 5907
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Patrick Linskey
> > > 202 669 5907
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Patrick Linskey
> 202 669 5907
>

------=_Part_76576_689412.1187655655683--