Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of michael.d.dick@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.132.242 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=rHWctJZGL9/uO28n6STC5GJ+DNVDccyXh8ibB3a2jJExwZTHr67abE2iudUGPIe10vrad7GkFOXUmFLMmkdZBn+YsDqkMDhhOBtyzZf3HQxZCTyHmZc8uR7oPXZcn0ZybwUpD2QZWyWQk4o1vXSWEW0qRoW/sfijM5ATDNPgC7U=
Message-ID: <72c1350f0708080726p6011e156ufdb64452e503d9b3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:26:21 -0500
From: "Michael Dick" <michael.d.dick@gmail.com>
To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] OpenJPA 1.0.0 feature/bugfix cutoff on August 20, 2007
In-Reply-To: <89c0c52c0708080534t619bbd5yacff89f74d959c33@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_951_5034472.1186583181581"
References: <7262f25e0708071517m49ff5435jc738b30621722659@mail.gmail.com>
	 <2BD7F295-CB7E-4AD9-A757-F86319EA13FA@apache.org>
	 <AE9EA536-0128-4854-A38F-E08794BEC155@SUN.com>
	 <89c0c52c0708080534t619bbd5yacff89f74d959c33@mail.gmail.com>

------=_Part_951_5034472.1186583181581
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

+1

On 8/8/07, Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On 8/8/07, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@sun.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Craig
> >
> > On Aug 7, 2007, at 3:41 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I'm going to turn this into a vote, just to get the ball rolling a
> > > little faster.
> > >
> > > The vote in question is to whether we will cut a release and begin
> > > the release voting process on Monday, August 20th, 2007 (with the
> > > ultimate goal of having a final 1.0.0 release approved by August
> > > 31st). Any new bugfixes or features for 1.0.0 would need to be
> > > committed by then.
> > >
> > > A vote of +1 approves the cutoff date, a vote of -1 indicates that
> > > you think we should wait longer.
> > >
> > > To start things off: I cast a vote of +1.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Aug 7, 2007, at 3:17 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> At the meeting today, we discussed having a deadline for 1.0.0
> > >> features. We mentioned the possibility of the 20th of August as
> > >> such a
> > >> deadline, so that Marc could achieve his responsibilities.
> > >>
> > >> Does anyone have any concerns about such a deadline?
> > >>
> > >> -Patrick
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Patrick Linskey
> > >> 202 669 5907
> > >
> >
> > Craig Russell
> > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> > 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
> >
> >
> >
>

------=_Part_951_5034472.1186583181581--