Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 86418 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2007 16:14:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Aug 2007 16:14:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 9345 invoked by uid 500); 28 Aug 2007 16:14:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 9317 invoked by uid 500); 28 Aug 2007 16:14:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 9308 invoked by uid 99); 28 Aug 2007 16:14:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:14:18 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mprudhomapache@gmail.com designates 64.233.166.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.166.180] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:14:12 +0000 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so1886588pyh for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:13:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer:sender; b=jinDmWuUfDc5r53S1WENLt0TdwMrXCm7txZ0eMq+Hmx89mWIvrdfTxK/OFm16Z4jc0hqWVE289DDfSxrduFNj47mMUsZg6I58OOHtzMs9F8Zqm3Dt3ii+32/zpeoBlRGjjlnmmoq5tQXqJzjQG73YyQLh05H1p4cmKscsP1IMFA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer:sender; b=uto2yRGzNPr+A/4o2J24zBI9suvckVK+9lzQY8EbBrYjwwPqCKM0AxZFoiw4r7TH22ap7+FYlQHV+AhB4t7JqnwZyQeR1k6oUkD1eXa6OgNETaZYKiXJv+ZN85T2Z9gObGDdY9QBrKwwBJQLEaDk9aOYmTJU9jt5t/eAEKWeYJI= Received: by 10.64.203.4 with SMTP id a4mr13363312qbg.1188317630690; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:13:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.101? ( [66.248.222.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f16sm3873463qba.2007.08.28.09.13.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:13:49 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: <574C98FB-E888-4B8C-A0AB-4F67DB4544A2@iq80.com> References: <574C98FB-E888-4B8C-A0AB-4F67DB4544A2@iq80.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <495677C8-C091-4C46-BECC-A7AFC89570D0@apache.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Marc Prud'hommeaux Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve OpenJPA 1.0.0 release (4th attempt) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:13:38 -0400 To: dev@openjpa.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Sender: Marc Prud'hommeaux X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Dain- Changing the release notes now would require a re-spin and a re-vote. Would your concern be sufficiently allayed if we added a note on the OpenJPA site (e.g., in the FAQ) about this? On Aug 28, 2007, at 12:07 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: > +1 as long as a textual description is added to the release notes > which documents the limits of the unenhanced mode and potential > data corruption this could cause. > > -dain > > On Aug 23, 2007, at 7:10 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote: > >> OpenJPA Developers- >> >> A fourth attempt is now being made to cut the 1.0.0 release after >> the discussion at http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Approve- >> OpenJPA-1.0.0-release-%282nd-attempt%29-tf4309295.html . >> >> A candidate build for OpenJPA 1.0.0 is available at: >> >> http://openjpa.apache.org/builds/1.0.0/downloads/ >> >> Please review these artifacts and signatures, and vote whether we >> should release them as Apache OpenJPA version 1.0.0. Release notes >> for this release are included in the artifact, or can be browsed at: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openjpa/branches/1.0.0/openjpa- >> project/RELEASE-NOTES.html >> >> The Apache Release Audit Tool has been run on the release, and no >> missing licenses were found with the exceptions listed in the >> exclusion section of the "rat-maven-plugin" configuration in >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openjpa/branches/1.0.0/pom.xml . >> >> In accordance with http://www.apache.org/foundation/ >> voting.html#ReleaseVotes , three +1 votes will be sufficient to >> approve the release for publication. While it is not possible to >> veto a release, the vote will remain open for the standard 3 day >> period (ending at 22:00 EST on Tuesday 8/28) in order to allow >> people to thoroughly review the release and perform whatever >> additional testing they desire and raise any concerns or objections. >> >> A vote of "+1" means you approve of the release for publication, >> "-1" means you do not approve, and a "+0" or "-0" means you are >> neutral. >> >> Thanks in advance for your diligence in helping to ensure that the >> quality of the OpenJPA 1.0.0 release reflects the high quality of >> all of its contributors! >> >> >