From dev-return-5830-apmail-openjpa-dev-archive=openjpa.apache.org@openjpa.apache.org Wed Aug 22 21:45:16 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 73116 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2007 21:45:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Aug 2007 21:45:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 80990 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2007 21:45:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 80968 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2007 21:45:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 80959 invoked by uid 99); 22 Aug 2007 21:45:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:45:11 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kwsutter@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.190 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.128.190] (HELO fk-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.128.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 21:45:09 +0000 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id z22so299914fkz for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:44:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Mg25oXQtndvsEMP0yCBROnJlAaRL5WYqjtfPmfZBDlzXI7c1CtDAbpD48py7LHnICOs6Eqg1azgfnYlaLTJpdFMoDGqeFILYFHQogmd61h5ep2BRUSnYDy2d6xXWpRjR0mp+8Ji/vYUAm5UBsEgvw8OFMgoIXJSNqrpO2Q5pTXs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Hq1ePg+QWAjkOEU26uweT+RHlZo3uiHZowsK6+R3gB/X2aC0lQf3W/b52/2/eJo2Nmvks+VTeq5rbd9y5mFngLXGZiKzDmqyBAc6m6mdCsr437s6+ykln/JreYfwDQZ3GBJwnmbz8rUXTRCJYZ4m3qOERSZuVRs4Vqr81ZFrbeI= Received: by 10.82.114.3 with SMTP id m3mr2437517buc.1187819087043; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:44:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.176.19 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:44:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <89c0c52c0708221444g569c7652x77f31f036d054824@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:44:47 -0500 From: "Kevin Sutter" To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Subject: Re: [RESCIND VOTE] Approve OpenJPA 1.0.0 release (2nd attempt) In-Reply-To: <7262f25e0708221427yc0d3a10wd6f37b857a80853@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_107529_32061611.1187819087010" References: <20846737-BF11-4225-BEC8-DDA72104A3A8@apache.org> <72c1350f0708221344u3d83e4abo88591b6d4882e96c@mail.gmail.com> <7262f25e0708221427yc0d3a10wd6f37b857a80853@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_107529_32061611.1187819087010 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline The fix is already in openjpa trunk, it just needs to move over to the 1.0.0branch. We might as well fix it. We were just wondering what the process was -- whether Marc was going to start over with another cut from trunk or just re-spin from the branch. We'll move this change over quickly... Thanks. Kevin On 8/22/07, plinskey@gmail.com wrote: > > Hi, > > I think that it's fair game for hardening / bugfix changes, but I > don't think that we should hold up the release for everything. > > Note that a new candidate build will be kicking off in the next 30 > mins or so (if it hasn't already). > > Do you think that this issue is worth holding things up for, or is > this more of a serendipitious situation? > > -Patrick > > On 8/22/07, Michael Dick wrote: > > Is the branch considered "open" and fair game for other new changes? I'm > > just curious whether I can / should port OPENJPA-326 to 1.0.0. > > > > -Mike > > > > On 8/22/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote: > > > > > > OpenJPA Developers- > > > > > > I am rescinding this vote for the second time, due to the recent > > > problems we discovered with the new enhancer property. > > > > > > I expect that within the next few hours we'll have a new artifact > > > uploaded and either I or Patrick will start a new vote. > > > > > > Sorry for all the false starts, but we want to be sure we get it > > > right. Thanks for your patience. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 21, 2007, at 11:59 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote: > > > > > > > OpenJPA Developers- > > > > > > > > A second attempt is now being made to cut the 1.0.0 release after > > > > the discussion at http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Approve- > > > > OpenJPA-1.0.0-release-tf4306366.html . > > > > > > > > A candidate build for OpenJPA 1.0.0 is available at: > > > > > > > > http://openjpa.apache.org/builds/1.0.0/downloads/ > > > > > > > > Please review these artifacts and signatures, and vote whether we > > > > should release them as Apache OpenJPA version 1.0.0. Release notes > > > > for this release are included in the artifact, or can be browsed at: > > > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openjpa/branches/1.0.0/openjpa- > > > > project/RELEASE-NOTES.html > > > > > > > > The Apache Release Audit Tool has been run on the release, and no > > > > missing licenses were found with the exceptions listed in the > > > > exclusion section of the "rat-maven-plugin" configuration in http:// > > > > svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openjpa/branches/1.0.0/pom.xml . > > > > > > > > In accordance with http://www.apache.org/foundation/ > > > > voting.html#ReleaseVotes , three +1 votes will be sufficient to > > > > approve the release for publication. While it is not possible to > > > > veto a release, the vote will remain open for the standard 3 day > > > > period (ending at 23:59 EST on Friday 8/24) in order to allow > > > > people to thoroughly review the release and perform whatever > > > > additional testing they desire and raise any concerns or objections. > > > > > > > > A vote of "+1" means you approve of the release for publication, > > > > "-1" means you do not approve, and a "+0" or "-0" means you are > > > > neutral. > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance for your diligence in helping to ensure that the > > > > quality of the OpenJPA 1.0.0 release reflects the high quality of > > > > all of its contributors! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Patrick Linskey > 202 669 5907 > ------=_Part_107529_32061611.1187819087010--