From dev-return-5822-apmail-openjpa-dev-archive=openjpa.apache.org@openjpa.apache.org Wed Aug 22 20:44:40 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 55205 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2007 20:44:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Aug 2007 20:44:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 16602 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2007 20:44:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 16451 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2007 20:44:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 16442 invoked by uid 99); 22 Aug 2007 20:44:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:44:34 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of michael.d.dick@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.229 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.229] (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.184.229) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 20:44:31 +0000 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id l58so223103wrl for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:44:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=tMa/PIAeOLGSEn9nL5TLBmUraq76IhyhpWHyJ9oJknrDvzbZBSuz9j1Q5RLyRP9UQt4VVEpOKcMTzWDZCH4MjX/YavdU7ZOssZXCBQY9Jr67L+fZq4q7OklZ4mSJ3W4lj/QLyXL8QgZZ5Z5zlaM7HRVCwxELScW24s3IyABqeHw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=IYTodPwbEDbN68rwbYUVfa68WaVx3x8TjVvKz1z5DSUEaNS0QBORowxAE1K8pGLnuqcnV6o3pPxGgoOx1NykxA6RMjvNoqwPa7gZXBUAMc3PrcqV6/47nfdMuGlDGf4BbmiN+e4U8Mb6ovQ1MfJn2cW/NUAGrlvWmYfMGmx6VMk= Received: by 10.90.51.17 with SMTP id y17mr642162agy.1187815449316; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:44:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.4.15 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:44:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <72c1350f0708221344u3d83e4abo88591b6d4882e96c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:44:09 -0500 From: "Michael Dick" To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Subject: Re: [RESCIND VOTE] Approve OpenJPA 1.0.0 release (2nd attempt) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_83066_1480118.1187815449197" References: <20846737-BF11-4225-BEC8-DDA72104A3A8@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_83066_1480118.1187815449197 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Is the branch considered "open" and fair game for other new changes? I'm just curious whether I can / should port OPENJPA-326 to 1.0.0. -Mike On 8/22/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote: > > OpenJPA Developers- > > I am rescinding this vote for the second time, due to the recent > problems we discovered with the new enhancer property. > > I expect that within the next few hours we'll have a new artifact > uploaded and either I or Patrick will start a new vote. > > Sorry for all the false starts, but we want to be sure we get it > right. Thanks for your patience. > > > > On Aug 21, 2007, at 11:59 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote: > > > OpenJPA Developers- > > > > A second attempt is now being made to cut the 1.0.0 release after > > the discussion at http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Approve- > > OpenJPA-1.0.0-release-tf4306366.html . > > > > A candidate build for OpenJPA 1.0.0 is available at: > > > > http://openjpa.apache.org/builds/1.0.0/downloads/ > > > > Please review these artifacts and signatures, and vote whether we > > should release them as Apache OpenJPA version 1.0.0. Release notes > > for this release are included in the artifact, or can be browsed at: > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openjpa/branches/1.0.0/openjpa- > > project/RELEASE-NOTES.html > > > > The Apache Release Audit Tool has been run on the release, and no > > missing licenses were found with the exceptions listed in the > > exclusion section of the "rat-maven-plugin" configuration in http:// > > svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openjpa/branches/1.0.0/pom.xml . > > > > In accordance with http://www.apache.org/foundation/ > > voting.html#ReleaseVotes , three +1 votes will be sufficient to > > approve the release for publication. While it is not possible to > > veto a release, the vote will remain open for the standard 3 day > > period (ending at 23:59 EST on Friday 8/24) in order to allow > > people to thoroughly review the release and perform whatever > > additional testing they desire and raise any concerns or objections. > > > > A vote of "+1" means you approve of the release for publication, > > "-1" means you do not approve, and a "+0" or "-0" means you are > > neutral. > > > > Thanks in advance for your diligence in helping to ensure that the > > quality of the OpenJPA 1.0.0 release reflects the high quality of > > all of its contributors! > > > > > > ------=_Part_83066_1480118.1187815449197--