openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marc Prud'hommeaux <>
Subject [RESCIND VOTE] Approve OpenJPA 1.0.0 release (2nd attempt)
Date Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:11:25 GMT
OpenJPA Developers-

I am rescinding this vote for the second time, due to the recent  
problems we discovered with the new enhancer property.

I expect that within the next few hours we'll have a new artifact  
uploaded and either I or Patrick will start a new vote.

Sorry for all the false starts, but we want to be sure we get it  
right. Thanks for your patience.

On Aug 21, 2007, at 11:59 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:

> OpenJPA Developers-
> A second attempt is now being made to cut the 1.0.0 release after  
> the discussion at 
> OpenJPA-1.0.0-release-tf4306366.html .
> A candidate build for OpenJPA 1.0.0 is available at:
> Please review these artifacts and signatures, and vote whether we  
> should release them as Apache OpenJPA version 1.0.0. Release notes  
> for this release are included in the artifact, or can be browsed at:
> project/RELEASE-NOTES.html
> The Apache Release Audit Tool has been run on the release, and no  
> missing licenses were found with the exceptions listed in the  
> exclusion section of the "rat-maven-plugin" configuration in http:// 
> .
> In accordance with 
> voting.html#ReleaseVotes , three +1 votes will be sufficient to  
> approve the release for publication. While it is not possible to  
> veto a release, the vote will remain open for the standard 3 day  
> period (ending at 23:59 EST on Friday 8/24) in order to allow  
> people to thoroughly review the release and perform whatever  
> additional testing they desire and raise any concerns or objections.
> A vote of "+1" means you approve of the release for publication,  
> "-1" means you do not approve, and a "+0" or "-0" means you are  
> neutral.
> Thanks in advance for your diligence in helping to ensure that the  
> quality of the OpenJPA 1.0.0 release reflects the high quality of  
> all of its contributors!

View raw message