openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marc Prud'hommeaux <mprud...@apache.org>
Subject Re: odd svn revision in release
Date Wed, 29 Aug 2007 22:14:42 GMT
Patrick-

Sounds like they built it themselves from the source zip (which  
doesn't have svn information), and their copy of "svnversion" for  
some reason doesn't like being executed in a directory with .svn.

This is a little surprising, since "svnversion" returns "exported"  
for me when run in a directory with .svn/, and when I build from the  
source zip, my version shows up as: "openjpa-1.0.0-rexported". I we  
were interested in researching this more, we'd find out what version  
of svnversion they have on their machine.



On Aug 29, 2007, at 5:57 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:

> Was in a stack trace on the users mailing list.
>
> -Patrick
>
> On 8/29/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <mprudhom@apache.org> wrote:
>> Patrick-
>>
>> Where did you get the 1.0.0 from? The version number looks OK to me
>> according to:
>>
>> [17:54 kemmel versiontest]$ wget http://www.apache.org/dist/openjpa/
>> 1.0.0/apache-openjpa-1.0.0-binary.zip
>>
>> [17:54 kemmel versiontest]$ unzip apache-openjpa-1.0.0-binary.zip
>>
>> [17:53 kemmel versiontest]$ java -cp apache-openjpa-1.0.0/
>> openjpa-1.0.0.jar org.apache.openjpa.conf.OpenJPAVersion
>> OpenJPA 1.0.0
>> version id: openjpa-1.0.0-r420667:568756
>> Apache svn revision: 420667:568756
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Aug 29, 2007, at 5:13 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
>>
>>>> Exception in thread "main" <openjpa-1.0.0-rType 'svnversion --help'
>>>> for usage. fatal user error>
>>>
>>> That doesn't look right. It looks like we might need to do a 1.0.1
>>> sooner than I might have hoped.
>>>
>>> -Patrick
>>>
>>> --
>>> Patrick Linskey
>>> 202 669 5907
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Patrick Linskey
> 202 669 5907


Mime
View raw message