openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kevin Sutter" <kwsut...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [RESCIND VOTE] Approve OpenJPA 1.0.0 release (2nd attempt)
Date Wed, 22 Aug 2007 21:55:42 GMT
Just completed moving openjpa-326 over to the 1.0.0 branch.

On 8/22/07, Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/22/07, Patrick Linskey <plinskey@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I don't think that Marc plans to throw away the branch -- note that
> > there is a decent amount of work in it at this point that is not in
> > trunk. So, he'd then have to also merge all those changes down to
> > trunk, and then we'd need to decide if everything in trunk was
> > suitable etc.
>
>
> Yep, that's what I noticed.  That's why I was asking the question.  Just
> making sure we were all on the same page of the process...  :-)  Thanks.
>
> Kevin
>
> -Patrick
> >
> > On 8/22/07, Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > The fix is already in openjpa trunk, it just needs to move over to the
> > > 1.0.0branch.  We might as well fix it.  We were just wondering what
> > > the process
> > > was -- whether Marc was going to start over with another cut from
> > trunk or
> > > just re-spin from the branch.  We'll move this change over quickly...
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > > On 8/22/07, plinskey@gmail.com <plinskey@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I think that it's fair game for hardening / bugfix changes, but I
> > > > don't think that we should hold up the release for everything.
> > > >
> > > > Note that a new candidate build will be kicking off in the next 30
> > > > mins or so (if it hasn't already).
> > > >
> > > > Do you think that this issue is worth holding things up for, or is
> > > > this more of a serendipitious situation?
> > > >
> > > > -Patrick
> > > >
> > > > On 8/22/07, Michael Dick < michael.d.dick@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Is the branch considered "open" and fair game for other new
> > changes? I'm
> > > > > just curious whether I can / should port  OPENJPA-326 to 1.0.0.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Mike
> > > > >
> > > > > On 8/22/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <mprudhom@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > OpenJPA Developers-
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am rescinding this vote for the second time, due to the recent
> > > > > > problems we discovered with the new enhancer property.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I expect that within the next few hours we'll have a new
> > artifact
> > > > > > uploaded and either I or Patrick will start a new vote.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sorry for all the false starts, but we want to be sure we get
it
> > > > > > right. Thanks for your patience.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Aug 21, 2007, at 11:59 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > OpenJPA Developers-
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > A second attempt is now being made to cut the 1.0.0 release
> > after
> > > > > > > the discussion at http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Approve-
> > > > > > > OpenJPA-1.0.0-release-tf4306366.html .
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > A candidate build for OpenJPA 1.0.0 is available at:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >   http://openjpa.apache.org/builds/1.0.0/downloads/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please review these artifacts and signatures, and vote
whether
> > we
> > > > > > > should release them as Apache OpenJPA version 1.0.0. Release
> > notes
> > > > > > > for this release are included in the artifact, or can be
> > browsed at:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openjpa/branches/1.0.0/openjpa-
> > > > > > > project/RELEASE- NOTES.html
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Apache Release Audit Tool has been run on the release,
and
> > no
> > > > > > > missing licenses were found with the exceptions listed
in the
> > > > > > > exclusion section of the "rat-maven-plugin" configuration
in
> > http://
> > > > > > > svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openjpa/branches/1.0.0/pom.xml
.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In accordance with http://www.apache.org/foundation/
> > > > > > > voting.html#ReleaseVotes , three +1 votes will be sufficient
> > to
> > > > > > > approve the release for publication. While it is not possible
> > to
> > > > > > > veto a release, the vote will remain open for the standard
3
> > day
> > > > > > > period (ending at 23:59 EST on Friday 8/24) in order to
allow
> > > > > > > people to thoroughly review the release and perform whatever
> > > > > > > additional testing they desire and raise any concerns or
> > objections.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > A vote of "+1" means you approve of the release for
> > publication,
> > > > > > > "-1" means you do not approve, and a "+0" or "-0" means
you
> > are
> > > > > > > neutral.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks in advance for your diligence in helping to ensure
that
> > the
> > > > > > > quality of the OpenJPA 1.0.0 release reflects the high
quality
> > of
> > > > > > > all of its contributors!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Patrick Linskey
> > > > 202 669 5907
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Patrick Linskey
> > 202 669 5907
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message