openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kevin Sutter" <kwsut...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: API changes
Date Mon, 20 Aug 2007 13:25:18 GMT
Patrick,
If I was forced to pick one, I would go with FooType, but I am flexible
either way.

Kevin

On 8/20/07, Patrick Linskey <plinskey@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think that I'm mostly done with the API changes -- see OPENJPA-317.
>
> One outstanding issue is a naming problem. Internally, we use a
> 'FooMode' naming structure for lots of our symbolic constants, but the
> JPA spec uses a 'FooType' naming structure for its enums. Which should
> we obey? The most recent patch mostly goes the 'FooType' route.
>
> -Patrick
>
> --
> Patrick Linskey
> 202 669 5907
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message