openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Fwd: Post-1.0.0 release actions
Date Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:30:53 GMT
Hi Brett,

We'd like to build both trunk and branches/1.0.x using continuum.  
These are two living code lines (with more to be added over time).

What's best practice in terms of continuum? I think adding a second  
project called OpenJPA 1.0.x would be appropriate, instead of adding  
14 new projects to the existing OpenJPA project.

Please advise,


Begin forwarded message:

>>> Questions:
>>> 1. Should we move our continuum build at http:// 
>>> projectGroupId=18 over to the "1.0.x" branch, or keep in on "trunk"?
>> We can actually configure continuum to build both trunk and 1.0.x,  
>> and I'd think that this should be the default going forward. It  
>> makes sure that both the future 1.1 and the future 1.0.1 packages  
>> remain buildable (once we figure out why the distribution doesn't  
>> build from continuum).

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System
408 276-5638
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

View raw message