Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 30405 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2007 20:00:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2007 20:00:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 32256 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2007 20:00:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 32233 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2007 20:00:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 32224 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2007 20:00:12 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 13:00:12 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of plinskey@gmail.com designates 64.233.166.183 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.166.183] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.183) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 13:00:09 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so2137098pyh for ; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 12:59:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LxfCdSkItUG3dvtaWKAKXfu76TKa+TCIeYq/cNK3p7YNp+3o5iQLwTizuEolIhGBIG4S5eMx8V9U6Qglj3PoV+QcgPNXbyE1zqRVFCXvaMVbloi6o7xfqSW5y8LkTyV+tPsy7pcF5j3UZkSMxsXhKRUMvvuYW1vg/c+mCNRejBI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HY9lkAU1QR3xeLtp/t1HpfsDN5qEZ+DIF4cytLHqWKH4dqYqMB3gO38skqeeDHQQoQPmmZrNcXANOnjcuMk/LyJEAhXeeB0A3zkcRrnXEJ8ReLknwCbKRFrj9XvL6Yc4NxTMNENsMXePXYVessrPtmidATroSWDZ3ueNvNyIxE8= Received: by 10.35.77.18 with SMTP id e18mr7170389pyl.1184011187662; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 12:59:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.31.16 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jul 2007 12:59:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7262f25e0707091259q2a03c056u42a5c7e771237845@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 12:59:47 -0700 From: plinskey@gmail.com To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Subject: Re: in-person meeting In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <7262f25e0707051009s35ff167hc550be6765eef231@mail.gmail.com> <7262f25e0707091126uca05eedv6eefcda77914cb05@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Sounds good to me. -Patrick On 7/9/07, Craig L Russell wrote: > The dates are fine with me. > > I have an agenda item for the meeting. Bill Pugh (who develops > FindBugs) is in town and would be able to talk to us about how to use > FindBugs to not only scrub the existing code base (lots of boring > work to clean up the code) but to report on bugs recently introduced > by commits so they can be rectified while still fresh. > > Bill would be able to make a presentation to the group and then > discuss the strategy to implement. > > It could also be done as a straight conference call but Bill is an > engaging speaker and I'd recommend taking some time to listen to him > in person. > > Craig > > On Jul 9, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote: > > > So it looks like the best all-around time is the 6th or 7th of August, > > with the second-best being somewhere around the 19th or 20th of July. > > > > Any more opinions about these dates? > > > > -Patrick > > > > On 7/5/07, Patrick Linskey wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> It turns out that a number of people on this list are based in or > >> around San Francisco. A few people have asked about more in-depth > >> code > >> reviews etc.; I think it probably makes sense for us to do a > >> face-to-face meeting open to all interested parties somewhere in the > >> Bay area. > >> > >> I'm sure that it'll be easy to find meeting space somewhere, so > >> probably the big constraints are interest and schedules. > >> > >> So: > >> > >> a. Are you interested in such an event? > >> > >> b. Does anyone have any particular time constraints? > >> > >> > >> To get things started, my responses are: > >> > >> > a. Are you interested in such an event? > >> > >> Yes. > >> > >> > b. Does anyone have any particular time constraints? > >> > >> The weeks of August 6-10 and August 13-17 are no good for me. > >> > >> Of course, it's important to remember that inevitably, not everyone > >> involved in OpenJPA will be able to attend an in-person meeting, > >> so we > >> must be careful not to disenfranchise people who cannot make the > >> meeting. Clearly, this means that we must not make decisions about > >> the > >> future of the project (IMO, it's ok to discuss and brainstorm etc., > >> but such discussions must turn into dialogs on the email list). > >> Additionally, we should make sure that someone is taking notes for > >> non-attendees, and that when possible, we maintain dial-in > >> capabilities for people who want to participate virtually. > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> -Patrick > >> > >> -- > >> Patrick Linskey > >> 202 669 5907 > >> > > > > > > -- > > Patrick Linskey > > 202 669 5907 > > Craig Russell > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo > 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > > -- Patrick Linskey 202 669 5907