Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 68159 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2007 18:27:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2007 18:27:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 34068 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2007 18:27:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 34038 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2007 18:27:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 34029 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2007 18:27:10 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 11:27:10 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of plinskey@gmail.com designates 64.233.166.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.166.176] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 11:27:07 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so2085599pyh for ; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 11:26:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GZWNRfhMerV1ASvPRIuj7eZszdhLJGKFUxBtJuPBH89LKSn4tIs8jKJj59Ts1tPz3Txy9cjmp6ePg6OF2LJ28sX6HPgH/jWA0OJSDK38ACd0cpiOYB3j3ROFfhbT7h5m23zbpQxAXPOtjurE6Dka4WSiGcM0s650OG+rZ9UaRnY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TvjpK1SIG44XpxnbAOSDKxKTm/qh93O1MnH7d2fEHwYZBjj3n55GPanF7MgpIIFdtolMREmsWPhCaOsFEOiCf5BaiNk+WCBbVxZy/3Mc1CZdkfXFCg7IowtOro2XNU2cWNR0LQJiLxpXe4wOfA7bo1FSu4dYEOSbFpxAlJjmfRE= Received: by 10.35.14.18 with SMTP id r18mr6996033pyi.1184005606527; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 11:26:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.31.16 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jul 2007 11:26:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7262f25e0707091126uca05eedv6eefcda77914cb05@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 11:26:46 -0700 From: "Patrick Linskey" To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Subject: Re: in-person meeting In-Reply-To: <7262f25e0707051009s35ff167hc550be6765eef231@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <7262f25e0707051009s35ff167hc550be6765eef231@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org So it looks like the best all-around time is the 6th or 7th of August, with the second-best being somewhere around the 19th or 20th of July. Any more opinions about these dates? -Patrick On 7/5/07, Patrick Linskey wrote: > Hi, > > It turns out that a number of people on this list are based in or > around San Francisco. A few people have asked about more in-depth code > reviews etc.; I think it probably makes sense for us to do a > face-to-face meeting open to all interested parties somewhere in the > Bay area. > > I'm sure that it'll be easy to find meeting space somewhere, so > probably the big constraints are interest and schedules. > > So: > > a. Are you interested in such an event? > > b. Does anyone have any particular time constraints? > > > To get things started, my responses are: > > > a. Are you interested in such an event? > > Yes. > > > b. Does anyone have any particular time constraints? > > The weeks of August 6-10 and August 13-17 are no good for me. > > Of course, it's important to remember that inevitably, not everyone > involved in OpenJPA will be able to attend an in-person meeting, so we > must be careful not to disenfranchise people who cannot make the > meeting. Clearly, this means that we must not make decisions about the > future of the project (IMO, it's ok to discuss and brainstorm etc., > but such discussions must turn into dialogs on the email list). > Additionally, we should make sure that someone is taking notes for > non-attendees, and that when possible, we maintain dial-in > capabilities for people who want to participate virtually. > > > Thanks, > > -Patrick > > -- > Patrick Linskey > 202 669 5907 > -- Patrick Linskey 202 669 5907