From dev-return-4754-apmail-openjpa-dev-archive=openjpa.apache.org@openjpa.apache.org Thu Jul 05 17:18:48 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 13290 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2007 17:18:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jul 2007 17:18:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 37143 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2007 17:18:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 37113 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2007 17:18:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 37097 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2007 17:18:37 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 10:18:37 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of mprudhomapache@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.233 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.233] (HELO nz-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.162.233) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 10:18:31 -0700 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id q3so1646428nzb for ; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 10:18:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer:sender; b=d4K2QRFOVAp/mUK9/zw+2sMs1i7uD5D0w1974ucFUnSydDDNJEtwxTi9IaJFx1gaIgl60XJmUHvyp704Bj9O+sQBoMGyb9BQmcIxKqJh58S+guTFPEy5vlciPgdCJoPatmdVE8K01ulyvSPjkmGDgLF26MF6ctdCS2y3mHBYSI0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer:sender; b=fxQfwhvCc+zeN8jk8M4DiP0ZAAmuqQG8aMtyYplNXy7KUCsbKmZjsvFbZjZ9FOYxFqxF5cG/z7mAW2+VAJNDGJjhbPTAYO7FQe1VEDY2jR3DD7WgSxoe5Xcut6gnvqJse9n25//jaWn0r3CB3EeEp3CffgaOpuMAdU1RegIF85g= Received: by 10.141.209.7 with SMTP id l7mr2391852rvq.1183655890201; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 10:18:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.15.100? ( [66.248.222.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l17sm367387rvb.2007.07.05.10.18.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 05 Jul 2007 10:18:09 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: <7262f25e0707051009s35ff167hc550be6765eef231@mail.gmail.com> References: <7262f25e0707051009s35ff167hc550be6765eef231@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Marc Prud'hommeaux Subject: Re: in-person meeting Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 10:17:55 -0700 To: dev@openjpa.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Sender: Marc Prud'hommeaux X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > a. Are you interested in such an event? Yes. > b. Does anyone have any particular time constraints? I can do it any time before August 8th or any time in the month of October. August 19-31 is possible, but difficult. On Jul 5, 2007, at 10:09 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote: > Hi, > > It turns out that a number of people on this list are based in or > around San Francisco. A few people have asked about more in-depth code > reviews etc.; I think it probably makes sense for us to do a > face-to-face meeting open to all interested parties somewhere in the > Bay area. > > I'm sure that it'll be easy to find meeting space somewhere, so > probably the big constraints are interest and schedules. > > So: > > a. Are you interested in such an event? > > b. Does anyone have any particular time constraints? > > > To get things started, my responses are: > >> a. Are you interested in such an event? > > Yes. > >> b. Does anyone have any particular time constraints? > > The weeks of August 6-10 and August 13-17 are no good for me. > > Of course, it's important to remember that inevitably, not everyone > involved in OpenJPA will be able to attend an in-person meeting, so we > must be careful not to disenfranchise people who cannot make the > meeting. Clearly, this means that we must not make decisions about the > future of the project (IMO, it's ok to discuss and brainstorm etc., > but such discussions must turn into dialogs on the email list). > Additionally, we should make sure that someone is taking notes for > non-attendees, and that when possible, we maintain dial-in > capabilities for people who want to participate virtually. > > > Thanks, > > -Patrick > > -- > Patrick Linskey > 202 669 5907